I am enjoying the blog feature with the ai article designer. I think this hands down saves a lot of time.
however, could we be seeing a 'product review' section in the
Yes, that is a feature that will be coming. We pulled it out of the initial release because there needs to be a lot of thought that goes into this.
But there will definitely be different "types" coming into the Designer platform as time goes on. ;)
Sweet - so I was thinking on the correct path. I mean, use it to our advantage while still making it personally human... its a win-win!
Readers want to see personal reviews, not computer generated. Writing from experience of a product is far more natural and Google will be happy.
Totally agree - I did forget to mention for outlining purposes only. See below dianes comment for clarity. :)
Hi - I am not sure using AI for product reviews is a good idea.
Google is looking for personal opinions, something unique, not just a rewrite of the product specifications.
So, if the review includes all the usual AI giveaways, such as Ah, Fear Not, Picture This, Hey There or any metaphors relating to sailing or dancing, then Google will potentially assume you actually have no knowledge of the product.
This makes sense i agree, i'm just thinking for outlining purposes.
For example: product review on 3 tine forks, and the outline is spit out as follows -- Introduction:
Engaging opening to capture the reader's attention.
Briefly introduce the importance of a reliable 3-tine fork in outdoor activities, especially for those who love camping, grilling, and outdoor cooking.
Section 1: The Anatomy of a Top-Notch 3-Tine Fork:
Breakdown of the key features that define a high-quality 3-tine fork.
Emphasis on durability, material, and ergonomic design for optimal performance.
Section 2: Forks in Action - Testing Grounds:
Share personal experiences or stories related to your RV adventures and outdoor cooking.
Discuss the importance of a versatile 3-tine fork in different scenarios – from roasting marshmallows around the campfire to grilling a hearty meal.
Section 3: Top Picks for Outdoor Enthusiasts:
Introduce three top-rated 3-tine forks currently available in the market.
Provide detailed specifications, such as length, material, and special features.
Share the pros and cons based on personal experience or research.
Section 4: How to Choose the Right 3-Tine Fork for You:
Offer practical tips on selecting the perfect fork based on individual preferences and needs.
Consider factors like length, weight, and handle grip for a personalized outdoor cooking experience.
Section 5: Maintenance Tips for Longevity:
Provide insights on how to care for and maintain a 3-tine fork to ensure its longevity.
Include cleaning methods, storage suggestions, and any special considerations for the specific material of the fork.
Section 6: Q&A Session - Answering Your Fork-Related Queries:
Incorporate common questions that readers might have about 3-tine forks.
Provide informative and concise answers to help readers make informed decisions.
Conclusion: Forking Fantastic Outdoor Adventures:
Summarize the key points discussed in the article.
Reinforce the importance of investing in a high-quality 3-tine fork for enjoyable outdoor experiences.
End with an encouraging statement to inspire readers to embark on their next outdoor culinary adventure armed with the perfect tool.
--------------------------------
Now, i'm saying, that the ai writer wouldn't write it for you. ( some may choose to at this point), but you could take an example of this and write your own review based on this outline. sometimes you might need talking points for your product review.
I don't know, maybe I'm over-thinking today...
See more comments
Could 'product reviews' be an option to add in article designer?
I am enjoying the blog feature with the ai article designer. I think this hands down saves a lot of time.
however, could we be seeing a 'product review' section in the
You have FANTASTIC responses here; kindly let us know if you require additional assistance.
I appreciate your question, Jeremy :)
i hope you were able to figure out your Shopify?
Yes, that is a feature that will be coming. We pulled it out of the initial release because there needs to be a lot of thought that goes into this.
But there will definitely be different "types" coming into the Designer platform as time goes on. ;)
Sweet - so I was thinking on the correct path. I mean, use it to our advantage while still making it personally human... its a win-win!
Readers want to see personal reviews, not computer generated. Writing from experience of a product is far more natural and Google will be happy.
Totally agree - I did forget to mention for outlining purposes only. See below dianes comment for clarity. :)
Hi - I am not sure using AI for product reviews is a good idea.
Google is looking for personal opinions, something unique, not just a rewrite of the product specifications.
So, if the review includes all the usual AI giveaways, such as Ah, Fear Not, Picture This, Hey There or any metaphors relating to sailing or dancing, then Google will potentially assume you actually have no knowledge of the product.
This makes sense i agree, i'm just thinking for outlining purposes.
For example: product review on 3 tine forks, and the outline is spit out as follows -- Introduction:
Engaging opening to capture the reader's attention.
Briefly introduce the importance of a reliable 3-tine fork in outdoor activities, especially for those who love camping, grilling, and outdoor cooking.
Section 1: The Anatomy of a Top-Notch 3-Tine Fork:
Breakdown of the key features that define a high-quality 3-tine fork.
Emphasis on durability, material, and ergonomic design for optimal performance.
Section 2: Forks in Action - Testing Grounds:
Share personal experiences or stories related to your RV adventures and outdoor cooking.
Discuss the importance of a versatile 3-tine fork in different scenarios – from roasting marshmallows around the campfire to grilling a hearty meal.
Section 3: Top Picks for Outdoor Enthusiasts:
Introduce three top-rated 3-tine forks currently available in the market.
Provide detailed specifications, such as length, material, and special features.
Share the pros and cons based on personal experience or research.
Section 4: How to Choose the Right 3-Tine Fork for You:
Offer practical tips on selecting the perfect fork based on individual preferences and needs.
Consider factors like length, weight, and handle grip for a personalized outdoor cooking experience.
Section 5: Maintenance Tips for Longevity:
Provide insights on how to care for and maintain a 3-tine fork to ensure its longevity.
Include cleaning methods, storage suggestions, and any special considerations for the specific material of the fork.
Section 6: Q&A Session - Answering Your Fork-Related Queries:
Incorporate common questions that readers might have about 3-tine forks.
Provide informative and concise answers to help readers make informed decisions.
Conclusion: Forking Fantastic Outdoor Adventures:
Summarize the key points discussed in the article.
Reinforce the importance of investing in a high-quality 3-tine fork for enjoyable outdoor experiences.
End with an encouraging statement to inspire readers to embark on their next outdoor culinary adventure armed with the perfect tool.
--------------------------------
Now, i'm saying, that the ai writer wouldn't write it for you. ( some may choose to at this point), but you could take an example of this and write your own review based on this outline. sometimes you might need talking points for your product review.
I don't know, maybe I'm over-thinking today...
See more comments
Is it just me, or does it seem like it's taking longer to get articles indexed on Google? I used to get them every 3-4 days after publishing, now it seems like weeks to months.
In addition, you would want to work on internal linking and not leave posts orphaned. And that's if you are not already doing :) Better Internal Links in Wordpress
It's a reference to a bernstein bears book "inside, outside, upside down".
I threw it in as it was on my mind, but to be clear, yes, I am internal linking on all my posts. I have an internal linker plugin setup as well.
:)
You have very good advice and guidance here…let us know if you have any further questions.
-Mike
It depends on your trust factor with Google and that's partly a reflection of how old and how active your sites are. My posts are normally indexed within an hour or two, so it does get better.
I can only imagine mine will increase...I'd like to think I'm pretty active however they aren't that old.
Mine are measured in years. And I submit my posts and pages to GSC as soon as they are published.
You can Request indexing for your pages that are taking longer, but that is their current assigned schedule for your website. Google will index different sites at a different rate.
Within Google Search Console, you will be able to inspect a page, and then REQUEST INDEXING. This can sometimes speed up the indexing process.
See more comments
Is it just me, or does it seem like it's taking longer to get articles indexed on Google? I used to get them every 3-4 days after publishing, now it seems like weeks to months.
In addition, you would want to work on internal linking and not leave posts orphaned. And that's if you are not already doing :) Better Internal Links in Wordpress
It's a reference to a bernstein bears book "inside, outside, upside down".
I threw it in as it was on my mind, but to be clear, yes, I am internal linking on all my posts. I have an internal linker plugin setup as well.
:)
You have very good advice and guidance here…let us know if you have any further questions.
-Mike
It depends on your trust factor with Google and that's partly a reflection of how old and how active your sites are. My posts are normally indexed within an hour or two, so it does get better.
I can only imagine mine will increase...I'd like to think I'm pretty active however they aren't that old.
Mine are measured in years. And I submit my posts and pages to GSC as soon as they are published.
You can Request indexing for your pages that are taking longer, but that is their current assigned schedule for your website. Google will index different sites at a different rate.
Within Google Search Console, you will be able to inspect a page, and then REQUEST INDEXING. This can sometimes speed up the indexing process.
See more comments
Maybe I missed the memo in training, or perhaps I understood it differently.
My question is this: You think of a keyword, let's say "What to do in Maui for free".
<
If your initial keyword is “What to do in Maui for free” and you’ve researched the topic, saw that it has a good score on Jaaxy and you optimize it for SEO then that should be your focus keyword. That’s a long tail keyword. A keyword can be any word/phrase that you’d be talking about in your blog post. You can rank for many other keywords (ex. What to do in Maui, Maui) as well if you’re really focused on your keyword.
I figured I could add other kewords, but as long as the main one is my goal. This all helps, thank you for responding!
I thought so too. I might see better results in rankings once I make all of my upgrade changes.
A "focus keyword" is the primary keyword or phrase you want your content to rank for in search engines.
It helps optimize your content for that keyword, increasing your chances of ranking higher in SERPs.
Right on. I feel like I mis-understood it at one point in time, then I doubled back and second-guessed myself, then I just ignored it, now im back on track.
Your focus keyword would be the entire phrase
"What to do in Maui for Free"
Don't worry that the "word" is called a "keyword", this doesn't mean it's a singular word.
A "keyword" can be anything from 1 word to LOTS...
Essentially, you're told to target "longtail keywords", these are usually phrases of at least 3 words (but usually more)
Partha
Ok, so thanks for that, I need to go through my 150 some articles and make sure I've incorporated at least that. No biggie ;)
I figured as much, but somewhere in the crossheirs, I started using just 1 or 2 words in the "Phrase".
Thanks Partha
Hey Jeremy,
As long has you have used your "focus keyword" within your article..
In the title
Within the first paragrpah of your introduction
And although NOT required - maybe within a subheading and perhaps in the conclusion
That's absolutely fine.
If you're talking about "going back through 150 articles" to add a "focus keyword" via your SEO plugin, don't worry,
I wrote the following 2 years ago... still relevant to this day Allow Me to BLOW Your SEO Mind An SEO plugin doesn't actually "do anything", it's simpy there for guidance, but as you'll see in my above article, you can actually manipulate an SEO plugin to give you a 100/100 score - this doesn't mean that you'll catapault yourself to top rankings - the most important part of SEO is what's in your article, NOT what you input into an SEO plugin.
So, as long as your keyword is included in your ACTUAL ARTICLE and it is OBVIOUS that your article is focused around that keyword, you're good to go.
Partha
I see your point, and I thank you for the tips. I still feel I need to take today to go through the majority of my articles, as It will help me see if I have at least followed THIS information.
So far, I've done over 25 and 5 I have done perfect in this nature. I may have slipped on some intro's but it's all getting fixed now.
Superb Info regardless, thanks Partha!
See more comments
Maybe I missed the memo in training, or perhaps I understood it differently.
My question is this: You think of a keyword, let's say "What to do in Maui for free".
<
If your initial keyword is “What to do in Maui for free” and you’ve researched the topic, saw that it has a good score on Jaaxy and you optimize it for SEO then that should be your focus keyword. That’s a long tail keyword. A keyword can be any word/phrase that you’d be talking about in your blog post. You can rank for many other keywords (ex. What to do in Maui, Maui) as well if you’re really focused on your keyword.
I figured I could add other kewords, but as long as the main one is my goal. This all helps, thank you for responding!
I thought so too. I might see better results in rankings once I make all of my upgrade changes.
A "focus keyword" is the primary keyword or phrase you want your content to rank for in search engines.
It helps optimize your content for that keyword, increasing your chances of ranking higher in SERPs.
Right on. I feel like I mis-understood it at one point in time, then I doubled back and second-guessed myself, then I just ignored it, now im back on track.
Your focus keyword would be the entire phrase
"What to do in Maui for Free"
Don't worry that the "word" is called a "keyword", this doesn't mean it's a singular word.
A "keyword" can be anything from 1 word to LOTS...
Essentially, you're told to target "longtail keywords", these are usually phrases of at least 3 words (but usually more)
Partha
Ok, so thanks for that, I need to go through my 150 some articles and make sure I've incorporated at least that. No biggie ;)
I figured as much, but somewhere in the crossheirs, I started using just 1 or 2 words in the "Phrase".
Thanks Partha
Hey Jeremy,
As long has you have used your "focus keyword" within your article..
In the title
Within the first paragrpah of your introduction
And although NOT required - maybe within a subheading and perhaps in the conclusion
That's absolutely fine.
If you're talking about "going back through 150 articles" to add a "focus keyword" via your SEO plugin, don't worry,
I wrote the following 2 years ago... still relevant to this day Allow Me to BLOW Your SEO Mind An SEO plugin doesn't actually "do anything", it's simpy there for guidance, but as you'll see in my above article, you can actually manipulate an SEO plugin to give you a 100/100 score - this doesn't mean that you'll catapault yourself to top rankings - the most important part of SEO is what's in your article, NOT what you input into an SEO plugin.
So, as long as your keyword is included in your ACTUAL ARTICLE and it is OBVIOUS that your article is focused around that keyword, you're good to go.
Partha
I see your point, and I thank you for the tips. I still feel I need to take today to go through the majority of my articles, as It will help me see if I have at least followed THIS information.
So far, I've done over 25 and 5 I have done perfect in this nature. I may have slipped on some intro's but it's all getting fixed now.
Superb Info regardless, thanks Partha!
See more comments
If you have a keyword that you search for, and your results are:
<10 Avg, <10 Traffic, and 0 QSR, do you go for it as "low hanging fruit"? What if the QSR is hoverin
You have fantastic responses here; kindly let us know if you require additional assistance. I hope you have figured it out.
Ok, this sort of starts to make sense. Going one step further then, if the <10 results are considered Unkown, then it's safe to assume a 0 QSR would benefit you pending a Google search vs one that has 34 let's say?
Did you read the last sentence in Diane’s blog link above? Tell me what does it say? Your answer is right in front of you. Please re-read and look 👀 for the sentence with the big G- that's the answer to your question.
Well, it's not quite as simple as that because Jaaxy only gives you the results for an exact match keyword.
In other words, if somebody types every single word in your keyword in the exact same order.
But Google doesn't work like that; it tries to understand what the "searcher intent " is - and will offer results that don't match exactly.
Here's an example - if you look in Jaaxy for "How to Lose a Stone in Seven Days," you will see that the result is <10 and the QSR is zero.
So, you might think you have struck gold by actually spelling the word "seven" rather than using the number.
But, as far as Google is concerned, it means exactly the same as "How to Lose a Stone in 7 Days" and will bring up all the results for that as well.
And if you look in Jaaxy for the second version, using 7 rather than "seven," you will see that the QSR is 200.
So, that's your true competition.
Always put your keyword in Google yourself, and look at what comes up to see who your true competitors are and determine whether you could beat them.
Thank you Diane. I assumed that meant less than 10 searches, further implying that anything under 10 was not being collected as data.
Do you know how well Jaaxy projects traffic compared to other tools? I've read that none of the tools really know and are guessing, but not sure how close the guesses are between the tools.
Regards,
Jason
Sorry, I don't know how it works, but it is based on historical data, not real-time, as are all the other similar tools.
I have wondered this same thing! Thank you for asking it. I am looking forward to hearing the answers. :)
See more comments
If you have a keyword that you search for, and your results are:
<10 Avg, <10 Traffic, and 0 QSR, do you go for it as "low hanging fruit"? What if the QSR is hoverin
You have fantastic responses here; kindly let us know if you require additional assistance. I hope you have figured it out.
Ok, this sort of starts to make sense. Going one step further then, if the <10 results are considered Unkown, then it's safe to assume a 0 QSR would benefit you pending a Google search vs one that has 34 let's say?
Did you read the last sentence in Diane’s blog link above? Tell me what does it say? Your answer is right in front of you. Please re-read and look 👀 for the sentence with the big G- that's the answer to your question.
Well, it's not quite as simple as that because Jaaxy only gives you the results for an exact match keyword.
In other words, if somebody types every single word in your keyword in the exact same order.
But Google doesn't work like that; it tries to understand what the "searcher intent " is - and will offer results that don't match exactly.
Here's an example - if you look in Jaaxy for "How to Lose a Stone in Seven Days," you will see that the result is <10 and the QSR is zero.
So, you might think you have struck gold by actually spelling the word "seven" rather than using the number.
But, as far as Google is concerned, it means exactly the same as "How to Lose a Stone in 7 Days" and will bring up all the results for that as well.
And if you look in Jaaxy for the second version, using 7 rather than "seven," you will see that the QSR is 200.
So, that's your true competition.
Always put your keyword in Google yourself, and look at what comes up to see who your true competitors are and determine whether you could beat them.
Thank you Diane. I assumed that meant less than 10 searches, further implying that anything under 10 was not being collected as data.
Do you know how well Jaaxy projects traffic compared to other tools? I've read that none of the tools really know and are guessing, but not sure how close the guesses are between the tools.
Regards,
Jason
Sorry, I don't know how it works, but it is based on historical data, not real-time, as are all the other similar tools.
I have wondered this same thing! Thank you for asking it. I am looking forward to hearing the answers. :)
See more comments
I know we have access to current banners / logos inside of WA, but is it possible to get some new versions of banners to attach to our content pages, or is there a way to make
Why do you think we should have new ones? What is wrong with the existing ones?
However, I see the screenshots from Kyle.
So I'd be patient.
Well, from my perspective, If I was searching for an incredible new journey, I'd want something more defined with the times.
Don't get me wrong, there are a couple of nice ones I like there, and am using. But the toilet paper roll with money...the couch... Those seem to, what's the word, cheesy.
I mean, I know some might like them, but if you want people joining WA through a Banner, it's gotta POP.
And yes, I'm patient, just getting the intel :)
Hi Jeremy yes all the banners will be updated sometime in Jan perhaps beginning of Feb
As there need to fix a few other issue and get it all done together.
You can read Kyle's response to me in chat a week or so ago on that.
As for creating your own there is no problems to do that you can easily go to Canva.com and create your own.
Awesome Awesome Awesome!
This is wonderful!
I will try out the canva site in the meantime.
They are always developing new stuff so new banners should be included. Make sure you scroll all the way down under banners. Some new ones there already.
See more comments
Is there going to be new banners?
I know we have access to current banners / logos inside of WA, but is it possible to get some new versions of banners to attach to our content pages, or is there a way to make
Why do you think we should have new ones? What is wrong with the existing ones?
However, I see the screenshots from Kyle.
So I'd be patient.
Well, from my perspective, If I was searching for an incredible new journey, I'd want something more defined with the times.
Don't get me wrong, there are a couple of nice ones I like there, and am using. But the toilet paper roll with money...the couch... Those seem to, what's the word, cheesy.
I mean, I know some might like them, but if you want people joining WA through a Banner, it's gotta POP.
And yes, I'm patient, just getting the intel :)
Hi Jeremy yes all the banners will be updated sometime in Jan perhaps beginning of Feb
As there need to fix a few other issue and get it all done together.
You can read Kyle's response to me in chat a week or so ago on that.
As for creating your own there is no problems to do that you can easily go to Canva.com and create your own.
Awesome Awesome Awesome!
This is wonderful!
I will try out the canva site in the meantime.
They are always developing new stuff so new banners should be included. Make sure you scroll all the way down under banners. Some new ones there already.
See more comments
You have FANTASTIC responses here; kindly let us know if you require additional assistance.
I appreciate your question, Jeremy :)
i hope you were able to figure out your Shopify?
I'm still thinking on it - I might purchase the domain and go that route! ;)
Okay! Please keep us posted on your progress, and all the best.