asked in
Website Development & Programming
Updated

No matter what I do, I cannot login in to the ftp server of my site. I am trying to use an ftp migration tool on a new server to transfer all of my files but when I enter the lo

I replied to your other post.....however I just found this.

https://my.wealthyaffiliate.com/website-development-programming/what-port-do-i-use-for-ftp

Why can t i login to the ftp server?

Why can t i login to the ftp server?

asked in
Website Development & Programming
Updated

No matter what I do, I cannot login in to the ftp server of my site. I am trying to use an ftp migration tool on a new server to transfer all of my files but when I enter the lo

I replied to your other post.....however I just found this.

https://my.wealthyaffiliate.com/website-development-programming/what-port-do-i-use-for-ftp

Login
Create Your Free Wealthy Affiliate Account Today!
icon
4-Steps to Success Class
icon
One Profit Ready Website
icon
Market Research & Analysis Tools
icon
Millionaire Mentorship
icon
Core “Business Start Up” Training
asked in
Website Development & Programming
Updated

I am moving my website to a new server and I am using an FTP migration tool in the control panel of the new server. It is asking for the Remote FTP Directory. What is the FTP di

Probably asking for your remote directory where your files are.

When setting up FTP for WA, I have my domain name (without the www) as my hostname and "/httpdocs/wp-includes" as the remote directory on WA server.

Thanks Lemm. I tried /httpdocs but no matter what I do I can't login into the the FTP. I can't login via FileZilla or through migration tool of my new server.

If you are not able to login, then it is more than likely that you have incorrect setup in Filezilla. Are you using the FTP username and password provided by WA?

You need to first click on "Build My Website" on left hand-side WA menu. Then click on "Details" of the website you want to FTP. It must be a regular purchased domain, not a siterubix domain. FTP is not allowed for siterubix domains.

After you click on "Details", you'll see your FTP username and password.

You also need to make sure that you use Port 21 for FTP connection. The FTP protocol used is FTP (called active FTP), not SFTP for passive FTP.

The hostname should be mydomain.com with your domain name substituted for mydomain.

The /httpdocs actually has nothing to do with a successful login. However, once you login successfully, it is considered your remote "Root" directory. It corresponds to your top level domain name.



Thanks so much for your help, Lemm. I got it all sorted out but it was 2 days of work! Far more complicated process than I thought it would be!

Glad to here it. I shall appreciate if you could tell me what new snags you hit, so that I can document it.

Well the snags were numerous. First of all, it took me a dozen times of trying to connect to the FTP through FileZilla. I was consistently getting connection error messages. Finally when it connected, I transferred the files from the FTP to my computer however what I discovered (after several tries when uploading to my new server) is that FileZilla did not successfully transfer all of the folders and files to my computer and did not give me any indication that these folders were not transferred. It turns out that approximately one quarter to one third of the files and folders on my site did not get transferred over which I didn't find out until I was trying to get the site working on my new server. When I tried to download the files again, the same thing happened. It would arbitrarily not download files and folders. I had to go through each folder and subfolder manually to make sure that everything was there and manually download them, file by file and folder by folder.

Finally when I got everything uploaded to the new server, I realized that my site was not restored. Since the site is built completely in Wordpress, I had to have the WA tech support make a copy of the MySQL database, which then I had to download via FileZilla again, upload it to my new server, create a new database on my new server and import the site's database into the new database. Then I had to edit the wp-config.php file to point to the new database and new server.

Then after all this, it still wasn't working and that is because all of the files were still in the /httpdocs folder and the links on the site did not recognize this folder so I moved all of my site's files to the root directory of the new server.

The process was not for the faint of heart! Luckily I have a little knowledge of the back-end development (but very little) and I had tech support both at WA and my new server who walked me through it all. Everything is finally working fine!

Hi Regina, Thanks so much for your detailed response. I really appreciate it. In the back of my head, I kind of figured that there would be database issues. Everything you said makes perfect sense as far as the process goes.

If you don't mind me asking....what was the exact fix that allowed you to connect to your server through FTP without connection errors? I will be bookmarking this for further reference.

See more comments

What is the remote ftp directory on wa?

What is the remote ftp directory on wa?

asked in
Website Development & Programming
Updated

I am moving my website to a new server and I am using an FTP migration tool in the control panel of the new server. It is asking for the Remote FTP Directory. What is the FTP di

Probably asking for your remote directory where your files are.

When setting up FTP for WA, I have my domain name (without the www) as my hostname and "/httpdocs/wp-includes" as the remote directory on WA server.

Thanks Lemm. I tried /httpdocs but no matter what I do I can't login into the the FTP. I can't login via FileZilla or through migration tool of my new server.

If you are not able to login, then it is more than likely that you have incorrect setup in Filezilla. Are you using the FTP username and password provided by WA?

You need to first click on "Build My Website" on left hand-side WA menu. Then click on "Details" of the website you want to FTP. It must be a regular purchased domain, not a siterubix domain. FTP is not allowed for siterubix domains.

After you click on "Details", you'll see your FTP username and password.

You also need to make sure that you use Port 21 for FTP connection. The FTP protocol used is FTP (called active FTP), not SFTP for passive FTP.

The hostname should be mydomain.com with your domain name substituted for mydomain.

The /httpdocs actually has nothing to do with a successful login. However, once you login successfully, it is considered your remote "Root" directory. It corresponds to your top level domain name.



Thanks so much for your help, Lemm. I got it all sorted out but it was 2 days of work! Far more complicated process than I thought it would be!

Glad to here it. I shall appreciate if you could tell me what new snags you hit, so that I can document it.

Well the snags were numerous. First of all, it took me a dozen times of trying to connect to the FTP through FileZilla. I was consistently getting connection error messages. Finally when it connected, I transferred the files from the FTP to my computer however what I discovered (after several tries when uploading to my new server) is that FileZilla did not successfully transfer all of the folders and files to my computer and did not give me any indication that these folders were not transferred. It turns out that approximately one quarter to one third of the files and folders on my site did not get transferred over which I didn't find out until I was trying to get the site working on my new server. When I tried to download the files again, the same thing happened. It would arbitrarily not download files and folders. I had to go through each folder and subfolder manually to make sure that everything was there and manually download them, file by file and folder by folder.

Finally when I got everything uploaded to the new server, I realized that my site was not restored. Since the site is built completely in Wordpress, I had to have the WA tech support make a copy of the MySQL database, which then I had to download via FileZilla again, upload it to my new server, create a new database on my new server and import the site's database into the new database. Then I had to edit the wp-config.php file to point to the new database and new server.

Then after all this, it still wasn't working and that is because all of the files were still in the /httpdocs folder and the links on the site did not recognize this folder so I moved all of my site's files to the root directory of the new server.

The process was not for the faint of heart! Luckily I have a little knowledge of the back-end development (but very little) and I had tech support both at WA and my new server who walked me through it all. Everything is finally working fine!

Hi Regina, Thanks so much for your detailed response. I really appreciate it. In the back of my head, I kind of figured that there would be database issues. Everything you said makes perfect sense as far as the process goes.

If you don't mind me asking....what was the exact fix that allowed you to connect to your server through FTP without connection errors? I will be bookmarking this for further reference.

See more comments

asked in
Keyword, Niche and Market Research
Updated

I have been trying to come up with interesting and compelling titles for my articles and many of those compelling titles include keywords that show up as a monthly search number

OK just to throw a little more fuel on the fire, take these two examples:

Keyword 1:
Monthly searches - 656
Estimated traffic (if in top spot on Google) - 112
QSR (Competing websites) - 143
SEO Power - 93 (%), GREEN indicator

OK 143 competing websites, SEO of 93 and a green light reads good to me.
But now consider keyword 2:
Monthly searches - 9,369,279
Estimated traffic - 1,592,778
QSR - 321
SEO Power - 57, YELLOW indicator

Higher QSR but still below 400, yet only 57 SEO rating and yellow light. Yet surely, despite the fact that there is almost double the competition you are surely far more likely to get hits from over 9 million searches than you are from a measly 656?

This is the sort of thing I am struggling to understand. From the training I would be looking for the green light and low QSR as a good sign and a pointer to the better keyword but this example suggests that is not the case.

Any thoughts anybody?

I'd like some feedback too because I would be tempted to go with keyword #2. It may take a little longer to "win" the keyword but wow the ROI would be great because the huge number of monthly searches.

I'm not sure how it works either. I have been using long tail keywords that fit the criteria in the training, QSR under 300, good SEOfigure, decent number of monthly searches etc. but having checked 5 of the keywords last night I could not find my site ranked in the top 20 pages of Google for any of them.

Maybe Google have not ranked the site yet, it has only been published a few days ago but it is an area I have always struggled with and it isn't currently working out the way I had understood it should according to the training.

I do not expect anything to happen overnight but I am still wondering if I am doing it right and using the right keywords and criteria. It is all still a bit of a mystery to me and I am wondering if some of us are misunderstanding how it works.

Me too. Maybe some guidelines about when we should start being concerned (taking into account we are following all the steps) if our keywords aren't reaching the first page of Google ... after one month, two months etc.

Yes that would be useful Devan. The thing I can't get a grasp of is exactly how to use all the keywords we collect. There seems to be a lot of training on how to get good keywords but not how to use them.

If you get one with under 10 searches a month you are not going to get many, if any, hits from it unless you have hundreds of similar keywords. Do we just collect a whole bunch of these long tail keywords and stuff them into an article or post?

Oh no. Don't stuff them all into one article. It won't help. It may hurt your rankings because as I understand it Google can pick that up and then penalize your site.

I only optimize for one keyword phrase per article/post no matter the numbers. I try to rank on the first page of the search engines for that one keyword phrase. When I am more proficient I may try one keyword phrase with a couple of variations of the same phrase.

Anyway, we will rank naturally for other keywords phrases as well in our posts or pages but I don't intentional try to optimize for more than the one phrase at this stage.

I don't always check up on my rankings but today I checked up on my latest post and low and behold it was in tenth place on the first page of Google. What did I do? I used my keyword phrase in the SEO title, (not the actual title), then twice in the first paragraph (one time bolded), twice more throughout the post and once bolded in the final paragraph.

I am still experimenting to see what works and doesn't work so I will have to try the same procedure with another post. Also my post was about 900 words. Not all my posts do so well and there may be other factors involved.

I think having it in the title or SEO title and the first 20 % of your content and the last 20% of your content is a must. It helps to bold it at-least once somewhere.

I think K&C (and K&C please correct me if I am wrong here) want us to target the LTK's especially QSR

Thanks Devan, that is more useful than you realise. Understanding keywords and the methods we need to use to make them rank well is something I always seem to struggle to get my head around the most. My "grey area" if you like.

As much as I believe that the WA system will be successful for me in the long run, it is important to understand if and where we are going wrong if we are ever to make any decent progress.

Giving it some thought, I still don't get how just focusing one keyword is going to get you very far. One that I researched has a QSR of 167 and 971 monthly searches. Sounds decent, but estimated monthly traffic is quoted as 166 if you are in top spot on Google. Even at say 2% sign-up rate, that will only net you three sales.

That is in the relatively unlikely chance you hit top spot remember so how are you going to vastly improve on that to make a real living? This is the thing I can't get my head around.

Thanks Gary. I agree we need to know where we are going wrong if we want to make decent progress. With K&C's method we have to write a lot of original content. There's no way around it. At some point I think we just need to trust whatever method we are using until we start seeing some results. Then we can look at the results and make changes.

3 sales per post per month isn't so bad though. Let's say 3 times 100 posts. That's 300 sales per month @ about $20 a sale equals $6000 per month. Now not all of our posts will get 3 sales. I am guessing here but maybe we need about 500 posts to have 100 in the top 3 spots in Google ( because we are optimizing and targeting winning keywords). This would take me at-least a year maybe others could do it faster. By the way I read somewhere that we should not bother selling products less them $25 per item because we want to make money with our business. Of course, $20 or $22 as with WA is fine.

And once you have that much quality content on your site and we start using other methods such as social media, book marking eventually getting into PPC etc. things could really balloon. Of course for me this all theory at the moment. Maybe some of the other more "successful" folks will chime in here to give us a little insight.

Lastly K&C say we should not pay too much attention to estimated traffic. It is supposedly not all that accurate. The QRS and monthly searches is what we should base our decisions on. That seems like a good one. At number one on Google you would most likely get 407 visitors to your site in a month (42%) if the search results hold true. If I recall correctly that is the figure to expect.

Also something that they do not teach us here because we are beginners is that once we have an authority site we can start targeting more competitive keywords and we will have a better chance of wining them.

Some systems teach this from the beginning. They have what is called Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3 keyword phrases. The keywords we are targeting here at WA as beginners are T3 keywords (long tail). Important for getting initial traffic to our sites. These are used for all of our posts per see.

Tier 2 keywords are more competitive - more searches, higher QSR (these should really be used for our theme pages on the WA site's we are building. It will take longer to rank for these KWs but they will bring in more traffic. All of the T3 Kw's (posts)should be related to their T2 page(theme). The T1 KW is used in our domain name (which I agree with K&C is kind of hard to do these days). I have chosen to use a brand for my domain instead of a keyword - again an experiment for me.

Anyway the point is I am going to go with K&C's method and later as I start to do well I may target more competitive keywords with greater traffic. However, for now it is not really logical because it is easier to get visitors to my site by focusing on the LTK's.

Keyword research and application isn't an exact science that's why most of us get easily frustrated. There is a little bit of instinct and common sense involved.

As I mentioned earlier at some stage we just have to trust the folks that have been there before us and hope for the best. My problem is who do we trust because most people I have come into contact with (including me) do not have proven success and the ones that do don't usually go into enough depth or explain the why? It is usually just do it this way. The problem is in this industry people find success but it doesn't make them good teachers and that's a problem from my point of view.

Anyhow Gary this my take on the keyword thing. Cheers.

That's a decent insight, thank you. You have covered a lot of points there so I am not going to waste too much time going back over them. I have actually been discussing a similar issue with another member recently.

I am building a large authority type site for my main niche, but for WA I am struggling to see how we would get enough hits each day to get a sale a day - for example if you were targeting the Vegas trip - I just don't understand how you can do that without writing hundreds of posts to get the required traffic. All the major sites (first couple of pages) on Google seem to have tons of content so that seems to be the only way to get top ranking.

That is why I am building a large site for my main niche, seems too me though that I will have to do something similar to promote WA. If that is to be the way it is then fine - just over three months at one new post or page a day and you have a 100 page website but I don't think that most people realise this and think you can just knock up a small blog-type site and easily get top ranked, but that doesn't seem to be the reality.

I agree. I don't see any other way.

I think it is basically best to follow those wise advice given in WA lessons. QSR less than 300 and more than 50 searches, and as Kyle says sometimes it's worth to go for those

I agree in principle but following that criteria so far isn't getting my site in the top 20 pages of Google search results.

I'm not exactly sure of the answer but we can spend the same amount of time and energy writing a post for a keyword with little competition and few searches as for a keyword with little competition and a lot of searches. It is true that sometimes the numbers don't tell the whole truth but I would rather spend extra time on keyword research and go with the later choice. It is a better use of my time and energy. Something that people often don't mention or talk about here in WA is efficient use of one's time to build a business. It is easy for "successful" people to target any kind of keyword even those that may not get traffic. They have already "arrived". It's a gamble but for others it helps to use our time efficiently so we can reach our goals sooner.

I simply use the formula of under 300 competition and over 50 monthly searches. Anything in this range is fair game to me. I use this formula regardless of the keyword tool, and many times without a keyword tool at all, looking them up straight from Google. Hope that helps. :)

Hello Divazona! Those are great questions. I would like to know the answer to the first question (the

See more comments

Monthly searches vs. QSR and SEO Power

Monthly searches vs. QSR and SEO Power

asked in
Keyword, Niche and Market Research
Updated

I have been trying to come up with interesting and compelling titles for my articles and many of those compelling titles include keywords that show up as a monthly search number

OK just to throw a little more fuel on the fire, take these two examples:

Keyword 1:
Monthly searches - 656
Estimated traffic (if in top spot on Google) - 112
QSR (Competing websites) - 143
SEO Power - 93 (%), GREEN indicator

OK 143 competing websites, SEO of 93 and a green light reads good to me.
But now consider keyword 2:
Monthly searches - 9,369,279
Estimated traffic - 1,592,778
QSR - 321
SEO Power - 57, YELLOW indicator

Higher QSR but still below 400, yet only 57 SEO rating and yellow light. Yet surely, despite the fact that there is almost double the competition you are surely far more likely to get hits from over 9 million searches than you are from a measly 656?

This is the sort of thing I am struggling to understand. From the training I would be looking for the green light and low QSR as a good sign and a pointer to the better keyword but this example suggests that is not the case.

Any thoughts anybody?

I'd like some feedback too because I would be tempted to go with keyword #2. It may take a little longer to "win" the keyword but wow the ROI would be great because the huge number of monthly searches.

I'm not sure how it works either. I have been using long tail keywords that fit the criteria in the training, QSR under 300, good SEOfigure, decent number of monthly searches etc. but having checked 5 of the keywords last night I could not find my site ranked in the top 20 pages of Google for any of them.

Maybe Google have not ranked the site yet, it has only been published a few days ago but it is an area I have always struggled with and it isn't currently working out the way I had understood it should according to the training.

I do not expect anything to happen overnight but I am still wondering if I am doing it right and using the right keywords and criteria. It is all still a bit of a mystery to me and I am wondering if some of us are misunderstanding how it works.

Me too. Maybe some guidelines about when we should start being concerned (taking into account we are following all the steps) if our keywords aren't reaching the first page of Google ... after one month, two months etc.

Yes that would be useful Devan. The thing I can't get a grasp of is exactly how to use all the keywords we collect. There seems to be a lot of training on how to get good keywords but not how to use them.

If you get one with under 10 searches a month you are not going to get many, if any, hits from it unless you have hundreds of similar keywords. Do we just collect a whole bunch of these long tail keywords and stuff them into an article or post?

Oh no. Don't stuff them all into one article. It won't help. It may hurt your rankings because as I understand it Google can pick that up and then penalize your site.

I only optimize for one keyword phrase per article/post no matter the numbers. I try to rank on the first page of the search engines for that one keyword phrase. When I am more proficient I may try one keyword phrase with a couple of variations of the same phrase.

Anyway, we will rank naturally for other keywords phrases as well in our posts or pages but I don't intentional try to optimize for more than the one phrase at this stage.

I don't always check up on my rankings but today I checked up on my latest post and low and behold it was in tenth place on the first page of Google. What did I do? I used my keyword phrase in the SEO title, (not the actual title), then twice in the first paragraph (one time bolded), twice more throughout the post and once bolded in the final paragraph.

I am still experimenting to see what works and doesn't work so I will have to try the same procedure with another post. Also my post was about 900 words. Not all my posts do so well and there may be other factors involved.

I think having it in the title or SEO title and the first 20 % of your content and the last 20% of your content is a must. It helps to bold it at-least once somewhere.

I think K&C (and K&C please correct me if I am wrong here) want us to target the LTK's especially QSR

Thanks Devan, that is more useful than you realise. Understanding keywords and the methods we need to use to make them rank well is something I always seem to struggle to get my head around the most. My "grey area" if you like.

As much as I believe that the WA system will be successful for me in the long run, it is important to understand if and where we are going wrong if we are ever to make any decent progress.

Giving it some thought, I still don't get how just focusing one keyword is going to get you very far. One that I researched has a QSR of 167 and 971 monthly searches. Sounds decent, but estimated monthly traffic is quoted as 166 if you are in top spot on Google. Even at say 2% sign-up rate, that will only net you three sales.

That is in the relatively unlikely chance you hit top spot remember so how are you going to vastly improve on that to make a real living? This is the thing I can't get my head around.

Thanks Gary. I agree we need to know where we are going wrong if we want to make decent progress. With K&C's method we have to write a lot of original content. There's no way around it. At some point I think we just need to trust whatever method we are using until we start seeing some results. Then we can look at the results and make changes.

3 sales per post per month isn't so bad though. Let's say 3 times 100 posts. That's 300 sales per month @ about $20 a sale equals $6000 per month. Now not all of our posts will get 3 sales. I am guessing here but maybe we need about 500 posts to have 100 in the top 3 spots in Google ( because we are optimizing and targeting winning keywords). This would take me at-least a year maybe others could do it faster. By the way I read somewhere that we should not bother selling products less them $25 per item because we want to make money with our business. Of course, $20 or $22 as with WA is fine.

And once you have that much quality content on your site and we start using other methods such as social media, book marking eventually getting into PPC etc. things could really balloon. Of course for me this all theory at the moment. Maybe some of the other more "successful" folks will chime in here to give us a little insight.

Lastly K&C say we should not pay too much attention to estimated traffic. It is supposedly not all that accurate. The QRS and monthly searches is what we should base our decisions on. That seems like a good one. At number one on Google you would most likely get 407 visitors to your site in a month (42%) if the search results hold true. If I recall correctly that is the figure to expect.

Also something that they do not teach us here because we are beginners is that once we have an authority site we can start targeting more competitive keywords and we will have a better chance of wining them.

Some systems teach this from the beginning. They have what is called Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3 keyword phrases. The keywords we are targeting here at WA as beginners are T3 keywords (long tail). Important for getting initial traffic to our sites. These are used for all of our posts per see.

Tier 2 keywords are more competitive - more searches, higher QSR (these should really be used for our theme pages on the WA site's we are building. It will take longer to rank for these KWs but they will bring in more traffic. All of the T3 Kw's (posts)should be related to their T2 page(theme). The T1 KW is used in our domain name (which I agree with K&C is kind of hard to do these days). I have chosen to use a brand for my domain instead of a keyword - again an experiment for me.

Anyway the point is I am going to go with K&C's method and later as I start to do well I may target more competitive keywords with greater traffic. However, for now it is not really logical because it is easier to get visitors to my site by focusing on the LTK's.

Keyword research and application isn't an exact science that's why most of us get easily frustrated. There is a little bit of instinct and common sense involved.

As I mentioned earlier at some stage we just have to trust the folks that have been there before us and hope for the best. My problem is who do we trust because most people I have come into contact with (including me) do not have proven success and the ones that do don't usually go into enough depth or explain the why? It is usually just do it this way. The problem is in this industry people find success but it doesn't make them good teachers and that's a problem from my point of view.

Anyhow Gary this my take on the keyword thing. Cheers.

That's a decent insight, thank you. You have covered a lot of points there so I am not going to waste too much time going back over them. I have actually been discussing a similar issue with another member recently.

I am building a large authority type site for my main niche, but for WA I am struggling to see how we would get enough hits each day to get a sale a day - for example if you were targeting the Vegas trip - I just don't understand how you can do that without writing hundreds of posts to get the required traffic. All the major sites (first couple of pages) on Google seem to have tons of content so that seems to be the only way to get top ranking.

That is why I am building a large site for my main niche, seems too me though that I will have to do something similar to promote WA. If that is to be the way it is then fine - just over three months at one new post or page a day and you have a 100 page website but I don't think that most people realise this and think you can just knock up a small blog-type site and easily get top ranked, but that doesn't seem to be the reality.

I agree. I don't see any other way.

I think it is basically best to follow those wise advice given in WA lessons. QSR less than 300 and more than 50 searches, and as Kyle says sometimes it's worth to go for those

I agree in principle but following that criteria so far isn't getting my site in the top 20 pages of Google search results.

I'm not exactly sure of the answer but we can spend the same amount of time and energy writing a post for a keyword with little competition and few searches as for a keyword with little competition and a lot of searches. It is true that sometimes the numbers don't tell the whole truth but I would rather spend extra time on keyword research and go with the later choice. It is a better use of my time and energy. Something that people often don't mention or talk about here in WA is efficient use of one's time to build a business. It is easy for "successful" people to target any kind of keyword even those that may not get traffic. They have already "arrived". It's a gamble but for others it helps to use our time efficiently so we can reach our goals sooner.

I simply use the formula of under 300 competition and over 50 monthly searches. Anything in this range is fair game to me. I use this formula regardless of the keyword tool, and many times without a keyword tool at all, looking them up straight from Google. Hope that helps. :)

Hello Divazona! Those are great questions. I would like to know the answer to the first question (the

See more comments

asked in
Search Engine Optimization
Updated

This is just a bit of advice. If you have not signed up for a Google+ account yet, do it now! And then when you sign up for it, make sure that you regularly share your website c

One thing to be careful of is to not check the share by e mail tab when you share pages, etc... I had my site taken down by an angry member who did not understand why he was getting e mails of my updates. Took a month to get the site back up.

How did you get your site taken down by an angry member? was this someone on Google or WA?

Please elaborate

It was on Google + A member complained I was sending out spam e mails, so Google suspended my page.

WOW, that's crazy! I did not know that was even possible!

Now I need to think about who I add to my google circles

Wooglie Googlie!

Thanks for sharing. It is definitely something to put some thought into!

Thanks for the advice!

Maybe you can tell me.. can we post our articles anywhere other than StreetArticles? I saw that a few people have put them on their websites as content. With the 30/30 contest going on, I have been focusing on writing articles, and not on adding content to my site.

There are several places you can post articles other than Street Articles. The are other article directories like HubPages (which is where I am now exclusively posting articles) and Ezine. There are others but those are the biggies.

I am not doing the 30/30 challenge so I don't exactly know the "rules" but I assuming it is just about writing 30 articles in 30 days and where you publish them is not as important. I would focus on adding your articles to your website much more than posting to the article directories if you are just building up your website. When you have links from your articles in the directories to your website, you want to make sure you have enough content on your site in order to capture the visitors attention. Otherwise the backlink isn't really serving it's purpose.

I've been focused on the 30/30 as well and have hardly any content on my site. As divazona pointed out it doesn't serve much purpose now but I think you can always go back and adjust your links and site content. Good question as to what should be priority when first starting out.

Thanks very much for the advice. For those of you/us who don't have followers on Google+ yet, do keep in mind that you have the option to post publicly AND to "circles".

Thanks!

But how many of your customers are likely to come from G+ unless you have thousands of people following you?

My personal belief is that a lot of people spend a time on things like this which would be better spent developing (e.g. adding content to or keyword research for) their websites.

You may get hits from things like this but I would imagine it is likely to only be a very tiny percentage of your total traffic. I may be wrong but that's how I see it.

I'm not suggesting that Google+ is where my traffic is coming from. What I have found is that posting my articles on Google+ gets them automatically ranked in Google and they get ranked very quickly. So if someone does a google search for my keyword, they might not find my article directly ranked in the top three, but they will find my Google+ share of that article which, if the click on that may them lead them to my article.

Ah right, I see what you are getting at now.

YEAP!!! ; O)

Very good advice - agreed,
Hudson

See more comments

Google+ and Ranking

Google+ and Ranking

asked in
Search Engine Optimization
Updated

This is just a bit of advice. If you have not signed up for a Google+ account yet, do it now! And then when you sign up for it, make sure that you regularly share your website c

One thing to be careful of is to not check the share by e mail tab when you share pages, etc... I had my site taken down by an angry member who did not understand why he was getting e mails of my updates. Took a month to get the site back up.

How did you get your site taken down by an angry member? was this someone on Google or WA?

Please elaborate

It was on Google + A member complained I was sending out spam e mails, so Google suspended my page.

WOW, that's crazy! I did not know that was even possible!

Now I need to think about who I add to my google circles

Wooglie Googlie!

Thanks for sharing. It is definitely something to put some thought into!

Thanks for the advice!

Maybe you can tell me.. can we post our articles anywhere other than StreetArticles? I saw that a few people have put them on their websites as content. With the 30/30 contest going on, I have been focusing on writing articles, and not on adding content to my site.

There are several places you can post articles other than Street Articles. The are other article directories like HubPages (which is where I am now exclusively posting articles) and Ezine. There are others but those are the biggies.

I am not doing the 30/30 challenge so I don't exactly know the "rules" but I assuming it is just about writing 30 articles in 30 days and where you publish them is not as important. I would focus on adding your articles to your website much more than posting to the article directories if you are just building up your website. When you have links from your articles in the directories to your website, you want to make sure you have enough content on your site in order to capture the visitors attention. Otherwise the backlink isn't really serving it's purpose.

I've been focused on the 30/30 as well and have hardly any content on my site. As divazona pointed out it doesn't serve much purpose now but I think you can always go back and adjust your links and site content. Good question as to what should be priority when first starting out.

Thanks very much for the advice. For those of you/us who don't have followers on Google+ yet, do keep in mind that you have the option to post publicly AND to "circles".

Thanks!

But how many of your customers are likely to come from G+ unless you have thousands of people following you?

My personal belief is that a lot of people spend a time on things like this which would be better spent developing (e.g. adding content to or keyword research for) their websites.

You may get hits from things like this but I would imagine it is likely to only be a very tiny percentage of your total traffic. I may be wrong but that's how I see it.

I'm not suggesting that Google+ is where my traffic is coming from. What I have found is that posting my articles on Google+ gets them automatically ranked in Google and they get ranked very quickly. So if someone does a google search for my keyword, they might not find my article directly ranked in the top three, but they will find my Google+ share of that article which, if the click on that may them lead them to my article.

Ah right, I see what you are getting at now.

YEAP!!! ; O)

Very good advice - agreed,
Hudson

See more comments

asked in
Search Engine Optimization
Updated

I have been with Wealthy Affliate for several months now and have been working diligently on my "expert" site and have started work on my second site which will, among other t

you can build a landing page and then create backlinks from high PR forums and blogs. If you can make sure the blogs and forums have dofollow. that will rise the rank of the page. street articles have dofollow. write your articles there and point them to your landing page that you builded for a business

Thanks so much for these ideas. The problem is, these are informational sites only. The owners will not be writing articles or contributing to forums for the most part so backlinks in that way are not an option.

Oh my, my diva friends - Regina and Rebecca -- Follow you everywhere!! We have got to get together in a hangout to go over issues just like this. I mean a power hangout, with a planned time frame and agenda. Game? PM?

Also, in answer. It would seem a site without a blog would have a keyword rich 'about me' or "what we do' page -- compelling content essential with a return for 'specials' on designated days. The 'blog' is a page for client comments and reviews. That is what I do with my Google clients. . ^_~1555/8/3

Girl! I am all for a hangout! You name the time and place!

Thank you for your answer. I think that is sound advice and I will review all of my sites. You are great!

We have a forum already started I think (with Rebecca and ?). See my profile page. Also a PM on a day would be a start. I have hangouts with other WA members on Thursday(ChrisC) and Fridays(Labman).
Thinking of a blog to announce a forming a WA hangout asking for agenda items and name suggestions? Think we should focus on a 'power hour' at the most. How about 'hour diva friends'? Divas are known as women with outstanding talent (most often in the arts). In Italian, the basic sense of the term is goddess (or in Latin, divus). Yet, wouldn't want the divos feeling left out. LOL. ^_~ 0646/8/4

Why not just create a static WordPress blog if it would eliminate all this hassle? Just wondering.. .:)

Hi Chris. I actually don't like working in Wordpress that much. The learning curve is steep and my knowledge of php is limited at this point. I have complete control of how my sites look and work in Dreamweaver as opposed to trying to customize someone else's theme in Wordpress and while I understand that every theme is customizable, in order to really make it work exactly the way I want, I have to know more about php. So unless a client specifically asks for a CMS, I still build my sites in Dreamweaver.

Here is another bit of information I found for you:

SEO Support
Search engine optimization is so important to most website owners these days that I even offer a free SEO class on my site to help designers get better at it. And many other Web editors are including tools to help optimize your pages for search. But Dreamweaver still doesn't have it.

If you want SEO help, you need to either learn it yourself, or use a tool like NetBeans, NetObjects Fusion, Alleycode, Trellian Webpage, or Serif WebPlus that includes SEO assistance.
http://webdesign.about.com/od/dreamweaver/qt/missing-from-dreamweaver-cs5.htm

Thanks, Rebecca! I checked it out and there is some helpful information.

Darn Diva, excellent question.(Oops I meant Darn, Diva.:o) )

I am facing a similar issue except I will add a couple of blog posts for the business sites I create for others. I'm thinking of outsourcing the ongoing SEO to a Fiverr or RentaCoder or other outsourcing company because I cannot figure out how I would keep up with it if i got more than a dozen clients.

PRWeb comes to mind. PRWeb is a company that enhances SEO performance with online press releases.

Since I do not know Dreamweaver this may be redundant. Knowing you, you have probably already explored the link below....but I love redundancy! (Just kidding of course >:o)

http://www.geckodesigns.com/tutorial-dreamweaver-google-seo-number-1.php

-Rebecca

The content you write in a standard HTML page should adhere to the same principles as if you had a WordPress blog. Although the All-In-One-SEO plugin in WordPress does do some of the footwork for you, remember that a blog page eventually translates into an HTML page. It has to. Browsers can only read certain types of pages (HTML,XML, etc.). So using that knowledge you could take a look at the source of your WordPress blog page after it has been translated by your browser into HTML and see where the All In One plugin may have placed certain tags (you'll know because they'll have keywords, titles, etc. in them) and then bring that over to your non WordPress site. My guess is most of the updates are going to be in the html <HEAD> section.

Personally, I am non sure if any of that necessary. I haven't used standard HTML tools in a while but I know they too are getting more sophisticated. So a tool like Adobe's Dreamweaver probably has something in it for SEO as well. I'm sure others will respond with some insight on that as well.

Thanks for your suggestion. The sites I am talking about I have created in Dreamweaver and there are no SEO tools like they have in Wordpress. I have to manually enter all of the meta data - keywords, description, etc. - into the <HEAD> section. But what I am asking, is what can I do to ensure that the site will be listed on the first page of Google when I am not adding content to these informational sites on a regular basis like on my blogs?

I am doing the same approach. I started a site that I have an interest in and I am now starting my second site to promote Wealthy Affiliate.

See more comments

SEO for a non-blog site

SEO for a non-blog site

asked in
Search Engine Optimization
Updated

I have been with Wealthy Affliate for several months now and have been working diligently on my "expert" site and have started work on my second site which will, among other t

you can build a landing page and then create backlinks from high PR forums and blogs. If you can make sure the blogs and forums have dofollow. that will rise the rank of the page. street articles have dofollow. write your articles there and point them to your landing page that you builded for a business

Thanks so much for these ideas. The problem is, these are informational sites only. The owners will not be writing articles or contributing to forums for the most part so backlinks in that way are not an option.

Oh my, my diva friends - Regina and Rebecca -- Follow you everywhere!! We have got to get together in a hangout to go over issues just like this. I mean a power hangout, with a planned time frame and agenda. Game? PM?

Also, in answer. It would seem a site without a blog would have a keyword rich 'about me' or "what we do' page -- compelling content essential with a return for 'specials' on designated days. The 'blog' is a page for client comments and reviews. That is what I do with my Google clients. . ^_~1555/8/3

Girl! I am all for a hangout! You name the time and place!

Thank you for your answer. I think that is sound advice and I will review all of my sites. You are great!

We have a forum already started I think (with Rebecca and ?). See my profile page. Also a PM on a day would be a start. I have hangouts with other WA members on Thursday(ChrisC) and Fridays(Labman).
Thinking of a blog to announce a forming a WA hangout asking for agenda items and name suggestions? Think we should focus on a 'power hour' at the most. How about 'hour diva friends'? Divas are known as women with outstanding talent (most often in the arts). In Italian, the basic sense of the term is goddess (or in Latin, divus). Yet, wouldn't want the divos feeling left out. LOL. ^_~ 0646/8/4

Why not just create a static WordPress blog if it would eliminate all this hassle? Just wondering.. .:)

Hi Chris. I actually don't like working in Wordpress that much. The learning curve is steep and my knowledge of php is limited at this point. I have complete control of how my sites look and work in Dreamweaver as opposed to trying to customize someone else's theme in Wordpress and while I understand that every theme is customizable, in order to really make it work exactly the way I want, I have to know more about php. So unless a client specifically asks for a CMS, I still build my sites in Dreamweaver.

Here is another bit of information I found for you:

SEO Support
Search engine optimization is so important to most website owners these days that I even offer a free SEO class on my site to help designers get better at it. And many other Web editors are including tools to help optimize your pages for search. But Dreamweaver still doesn't have it.

If you want SEO help, you need to either learn it yourself, or use a tool like NetBeans, NetObjects Fusion, Alleycode, Trellian Webpage, or Serif WebPlus that includes SEO assistance.
http://webdesign.about.com/od/dreamweaver/qt/missing-from-dreamweaver-cs5.htm

Thanks, Rebecca! I checked it out and there is some helpful information.

Darn Diva, excellent question.(Oops I meant Darn, Diva.:o) )

I am facing a similar issue except I will add a couple of blog posts for the business sites I create for others. I'm thinking of outsourcing the ongoing SEO to a Fiverr or RentaCoder or other outsourcing company because I cannot figure out how I would keep up with it if i got more than a dozen clients.

PRWeb comes to mind. PRWeb is a company that enhances SEO performance with online press releases.

Since I do not know Dreamweaver this may be redundant. Knowing you, you have probably already explored the link below....but I love redundancy! (Just kidding of course >:o)

http://www.geckodesigns.com/tutorial-dreamweaver-google-seo-number-1.php

-Rebecca

The content you write in a standard HTML page should adhere to the same principles as if you had a WordPress blog. Although the All-In-One-SEO plugin in WordPress does do some of the footwork for you, remember that a blog page eventually translates into an HTML page. It has to. Browsers can only read certain types of pages (HTML,XML, etc.). So using that knowledge you could take a look at the source of your WordPress blog page after it has been translated by your browser into HTML and see where the All In One plugin may have placed certain tags (you'll know because they'll have keywords, titles, etc. in them) and then bring that over to your non WordPress site. My guess is most of the updates are going to be in the html <HEAD> section.

Personally, I am non sure if any of that necessary. I haven't used standard HTML tools in a while but I know they too are getting more sophisticated. So a tool like Adobe's Dreamweaver probably has something in it for SEO as well. I'm sure others will respond with some insight on that as well.

Thanks for your suggestion. The sites I am talking about I have created in Dreamweaver and there are no SEO tools like they have in Wordpress. I have to manually enter all of the meta data - keywords, description, etc. - into the <HEAD> section. But what I am asking, is what can I do to ensure that the site will be listed on the first page of Google when I am not adding content to these informational sites on a regular basis like on my blogs?

I am doing the same approach. I started a site that I have an interest in and I am now starting my second site to promote Wealthy Affiliate.

See more comments

Login
Create Your Free Wealthy Affiliate Account Today!
icon
4-Steps to Success Class
icon
One Profit Ready Website
icon
Market Research & Analysis Tools
icon
Millionaire Mentorship
icon
Core “Business Start Up” Training