Posts
40
Questions
5
Today's Having Beer with Kyle, triggered this question, that I am sure others also have.
Without divulging to much proprietary detail, I would like to know the "weight"
Very I use it in all my articles :) Max 5000 characters. Cool Strategies for Article Design Optional Content
Hey Abie, Happy Easter FriSatSu.
I have watched this video and use the Optional Area frequently, especially when I have a contrarian point I want to make.
But when does our optional area input topple the original direction of the content writer?
It is a tool, GIGO (Garbage In, Garbage Out); what you feed it will produce. How good is your optional content?
Of course, it should not be copied word for word. Facts need to be checked and cross-referenced. Additionally, your voice, experience, style, and emotions need to be incorporated to polish the piece, making it ready to serve its purpose.
You might remove entire sections and add new ones. There have been instances when I didn’t like what I got and changed it all.
Sometimes, it doesn’t follow your intentions, or we may need training to prompt it correctly so that we can use it effectively.
There’s a lot of trial and error involved in the process. However, it is mostly worthwhile as long as it is treated as a tool. It does help with productivity.
===
This may change as we progress and more advancements are added.
Lol Abie,
That is my question. How far can I push it before the output becomes rubbish?
It does not start out being a trash producer, but it definitely can become one.
There is a fine line somewhere.
If we add any content to the optional area is the entire outline based on our optional details?
Are we supplementing the "original" outline to include what we want as in an extra section?
Or is it working the optional information into the "original"?
I have not been able to determine which way the designer is flowing.
Hopefull this clarifies what I am asking.
You have to check the article on an article basis and decide how worthy it is.
Where's the evidence here? "It does not start out being a trash producer, but it definitely can become one."
Fine line, maybe... I am yet to realize it.
You can edit your outline anytime you think it does not meet your needs. You can add a section or diminish another. You control that.
I don't understand what you mean by "Original." - Can you clarify?
Maybe we're both in the same boat here :)
Abie, we may be in the same boat as optional area users.
Here are the assumptions that I have
1. Add nothing to the "optional details" and get an article designed to cover our topic.
2. We can "change" the output by adding "optional details". If the optional details are "minor" additions, the outline will stay relatively the same as the original nonmodified outline.
But let's say that we take Eric's deep dive bullet-pointed details from the top 2 ranking sites, and add that to the optional detail area.
At what point does the AI-created outline stop producing the outline for the "Title Content" we wanted to create and simply produce something based entirely on the optional details that we fed it? So my question is
3. How many "optional details" will it take to completely transform the original (no added optional details) outline into something completely different from what it would have created had we added nothing?
When does our "Garbage In" overrun the process and give us "Garbage Out"?
Put another way, how hard will the AI "fight" to keep its original output true to the concept of the title versus giving up and providing us with what it thinks we want?
I hope you are enjoying your Easter.
See more comments
Today's Having Beer with Kyle, triggered this question, that I am sure others also have.
Without divulging to much proprietary detail, I would like to know the "weight"
Hey Donald,
Not having used the WA AI generator, I can only speak on what other authorities have clearly stated about using AI generated content and that is that it takes time to train any AI generator.
Plsu, you have to double check the output so it does NOT replace actual researching, and you need to reword the output to make it yours.
If your output sounds like a robot made it, your content will do you more harm than good... and that is a given.
It's similar to the old spinner software... you have to rewrite the output to make it yours.
Hope that helps you.
Trish,
I highly recommend the AI Content writer. The outlines that it creates are quite good.
I occasionally create contrarian content (Google is Dead, Don't Pick Niches of Lists, etc) and add my take to the AI content generator. It does well with this as well. I have a weird curiosity about things at times.
But how far can I push the generator without it leaving its original intent in content outlines?
Very I use it in all my articles :) Max 5000 characters. Cool Strategies for Article Design Optional Content
Hey Abie, Happy Easter FriSatSu.
I have watched this video and use the Optional Area frequently, especially when I have a contrarian point I want to make.
But when does our optional area input topple the original direction of the content writer?
It is a tool, GIGO (Garbage In, Garbage Out); what you feed it will produce. How good is your optional content?
Of course, it should not be copied word for word. Facts need to be checked and cross-referenced. Additionally, your voice, experience, style, and emotions need to be incorporated to polish the piece, making it ready to serve its purpose.
You might remove entire sections and add new ones. There have been instances when I didn’t like what I got and changed it all.
Sometimes, it doesn’t follow your intentions, or we may need training to prompt it correctly so that we can use it effectively.
There’s a lot of trial and error involved in the process. However, it is mostly worthwhile as long as it is treated as a tool. It does help with productivity.
===
This may change as we progress and more advancements are added.
Lol Abie,
That is my question. How far can I push it before the output becomes rubbish?
It does not start out being a trash producer, but it definitely can become one.
There is a fine line somewhere.
If we add any content to the optional area is the entire outline based on our optional details?
Are we supplementing the "original" outline to include what we want as in an extra section?
Or is it working the optional information into the "original"?
I have not been able to determine which way the designer is flowing.
Hopefull this clarifies what I am asking.
You have to check the article on an article basis and decide how worthy it is.
Where's the evidence here? "It does not start out being a trash producer, but it definitely can become one."
Fine line, maybe... I am yet to realize it.
You can edit your outline anytime you think it does not meet your needs. You can add a section or diminish another. You control that.
I don't understand what you mean by "Original." - Can you clarify?
Maybe we're both in the same boat here :)
Abie, we may be in the same boat as optional area users.
Here are the assumptions that I have
1. Add nothing to the "optional details" and get an article designed to cover our topic.
2. We can "change" the output by adding "optional details". If the optional details are "minor" additions, the outline will stay relatively the same as the original nonmodified outline.
But let's say that we take Eric's deep dive bullet-pointed details from the top 2 ranking sites, and add that to the optional detail area.
At what point does the AI-created outline stop producing the outline for the "Title Content" we wanted to create and simply produce something based entirely on the optional details that we fed it? So my question is
3. How many "optional details" will it take to completely transform the original (no added optional details) outline into something completely different from what it would have created had we added nothing?
When does our "Garbage In" overrun the process and give us "Garbage Out"?
Put another way, how hard will the AI "fight" to keep its original output true to the concept of the title versus giving up and providing us with what it thinks we want?
I hope you are enjoying your Easter.
See more comments
Hey Donald,
Not having used the WA AI generator, I can only speak on what other authorities have clearly stated about using AI generated content and that is that it takes time to train any AI generator.
Plsu, you have to double check the output so it does NOT replace actual researching, and you need to reword the output to make it yours.
If your output sounds like a robot made it, your content will do you more harm than good... and that is a given.
It's similar to the old spinner software... you have to rewrite the output to make it yours.
Hope that helps you.
Trish,
I highly recommend the AI Content writer. The outlines that it creates are quite good.
I occasionally create contrarian content (Google is Dead, Don't Pick Niches of Lists, etc) and add my take to the AI content generator. It does well with this as well. I have a weird curiosity about things at times.
But how far can I push the generator without it leaving its original intent in content outlines?