WA Rules 9, 10 and 11
Rule 10-No problems there, very straight forward
I have seen Rule 9 broken many times; maybe there are accepted exceptions as suggested by one member.
if there are exceptions , the rule should state the exceptions.
Is this rule legitimizing taking content from an external website?
Rule 11-The teacher experience in me wili add- NO- at the beginning of the sentence; please forgive me.
I did receive a private message some time ago that was tempting, but against Rule 11. I did not respond although the temptation was about something I thought would have been an additional asset to WA premium members to help boost earnings within the membership.
I am still hoping that Kyle,Carson and the membership will put their thinking caps on and address the issue mentioned in the paragraph above.
I know it is a sensitive issue and I am almost afraid to voice it.
Recent Comments
10
I'm adding the link for clarification Spam is a NO NO! 9. Do not post content where your readers are required to go to an external website to "read more". All of the content must be self contained within the post itself.
10. No soliciting phone numbers or asking people to call you
11. Asking for personal contact information
With regard to Rule #9 the key word here is "required". I have put up posts where I've included a link to an external resource for further clarification or just to show the source of my information. But the posts have been complete within themselves and the external link is not "required". I have seen many instances where other members break this rule.
Yes, the word "No" is missing from Rule #11.
Thanks Marion; I was blocked from posting the rules as you have above, I did not copy , I typed them; Why was i blocked because I was allowed to published when i removed the text.Don't' understand.
Perhaps you could publish the post then go back and add the links using the "Edit" feature. Click on the gear icon to edit.
I think the rules can benefit from someone with a legal mind or a very critical thinker.; no offence to Kyle and Carson.
I do not believe there are any exceptions to the rules. I just think that some members here break the rules continually. I also think that the rules should be made more available to the members, like via a button in the top right corner or something. they should definitely be available to new members who are joining. I do agree that the word NO needs to be in front of rule 11. Just my opinion.
The rules are available to all ; maybe they should be a requirement where every member should acknowledge that they have read the rules.I am happy that there has been some tolerance on the part of Admin.
See more comments
Many thanks for sharing :)