Siterubix and SSL
As many of you know members have many benefits that WA has over the years given a boost to our websites with the many features over the years. Three as you can see below are SiteSpeed, Free SSL and SiteProtect.
The one I am confused about is the Free SSL relating to WA's Siterubix Websites as you can see below this in not available for the siterubix ones only for the websites that are owned and hosted here within WA.
I was looking at WA main page where a vistor would see some of the features available should they be interested in joining WA. This is where I noticed a discreptancy with regards to the Siterubix
The image below show the discreptancy ( I would like to think this is an error that has been overlooked) As you can see it states clearly Site Rubix + Free SSL which is not the case as shown in the first image above.
So I am hoping that this is either something planned in the near future if so then it should not state free SSL until it is actually available.
If there is no intention to add Free SSL to the Site Rubix then again this should be taken off.
This could simply be an overlooked error but in the eyes of a visitor who may join, it may seem like false advertisment.
This is how I see it as when looking from a visitor's perspective.
Love to hear your input and also if you noticed this or any other issues that WA may need to look into and fix.
Andre
Recent Comments
12
Thank already sent an email to Kyle direct but wanted members to be aware of this in case they may not know about it and a new visitor or a newbie asks them why?
Wishing you well along your own journey
Andre
See more comments
.siterubix.com websites are currently not on SSL, but this is certainly on the agenda for the near future. :)
You can expect this to be the case in the upcoming few months here, it is a sizeable update considering the number of domains on http://.siterubix.com, but one that are already working on.
Surprised that you are still awake then again it is WA we are talking about.
Thanks for the response Kyle certainly glad you mentioned it here so others have the correct answers as to why the difference.
Will this be corrected on the WA site as shown in my second image as I feel even though this is planned for the future it is still not correct in current time and perhaps should be better added once this has been achieved?
Once again thanks for your response now and in advanced to your second response.
Get some sleep
Andre
Thanks for the info Kyle
So typically WA... it just keeps getting better!
Thanks Kyle.