Quick List of Plagiarism Detection Tools
Here is a short list of plagiarism sites that will check articles for repeat content.
Might come in handy while navigating the NLP AI world!
- GPTZero: Plagiarism checker. 98% success rate. Probably the most accurate GPT chat detector. Free.
- Turnitin: Plagiarism checker. 97%. Success rate. Offers a free version.
- Chegg: Plagiarism checker. 3-day free trial, then a monthly fee.
- Grammerly Plagiarism checker. Has a built-in plagiarism checker. Free
- Easybib: Plagiarism checker. Limited free trial then a monthly fee.
- Plagly: Plagiarism checker. Free
(I'm not affiliated with any of the above entities.)
Recent Comments
16
Thanks, Tami. I use Grammarly in writing my books, but I did not know they had a plagiarism checker.
JD
I already use these plagiarism tools. As an educator, we use them to catch students doing this. Thanks for informing us it's worth knowing these tools that are out there for us to use.
Thanks Brenda,
The education arena is definitely being impacted by NLP (Natural Language Progression) AI. I can think of a lot of negative consequences resulting from being able to get content on demand. Hopefully, the concept will find its yin and yang!
Tami
Tami, for sure. Some of my students used AI from ChatGpt, and the college has zero tolerance, so they had to rewrite in their own words or accept the fail grade. Most of them apologized and did the rewrite in their own words.
Thanks, Tami
Thanks for the list! 😎
I use Grammarly Pro, and I love it, but it doesn't check for AI-generated content, which could be important if you outsource content.
Originality.AI has an AI Detection tool, along with a plagiarism checker, but it's not free.
Frank 🎸
Thanks Frank,
There is a lot to be learned about AI but WA peeps seem to be right on top of every angle!
Tami
So here again, I am thrown back into confusion. This is with regard to chat GPT. I am beginning to understand how to use it. Once it gives me answers, what do I do with it if I’m not supposed to use the answers? I understand the part about using my voice. I don’t understand how much of my voice I can use and how much of chat GPT I can use. I’m bewildered.
Hazel
Hi - thank you for the list, but AI does not produce plagiarised content.
So, only the first one will detect AI.
Thanks Diane,
It's not really a matter of what AI produces, but rather the copy and pasting of the output received from a query. It is a bit of a controversial area right now. After all, the AI output is not the original thought of the person requesting the information.
My research unveiled that search engines have the capability of detecting text that is AI-generated or human-generated and this is implemented over obvious concerns.
(SearchengineJournal.com): "Google’s Search Advocate John Mueller says content automatically generated with AI writing tools is considered spam, according to the search engine’s webmaster guidelines.
This topic is addressed during a recent Google Search Central SEO office-hours hangout in response to a question about GPT-3 AI writing tools.
There’s a debate in the SEO community about the use of GPT-3 tools and whether they’re acceptable from Google’s point of view. Mueller says content written by AI falls under the category of auto-generated content, which could lead to a manual penalty."
(surroundtable.com) "Nov 30, 2022 — Google: We Have Algorithms To Detect & Demote AI Altered Plagiarized Content. -Duy Nguyen, Google. In this article, his reference is as such: "Google has algorithms to go after" those who post AI-plagiarized content..."
So, it seems that Google deems copy and paste AI as plagiarized.
ChatGPT is only one among many other companies that have NLP (Natural Language Processing) AI that they have trained to algorithmically produce text-based output. (ChatSonic, JasperChat, Bing AI, Socratic, DialoGpt, et. al.)
There are a vast amount of NLP AI programs that have been available alongside ChatGPT, for individual industries, such as medical, engineering, agriculture, and military, to name a few. These AI programs are trained specifically for their area of expertise.
I personally, feel like it's better safe than sorry when it comes to cut and paste. Whether by voice or direct to word processors, I use the output as a skeleton and add to it in my own writing.
See more comments
Thanks for the list, Tami. Appreciate the share.
Susan