Be Mean To Your LLM

Be mean to your LLM. Yes, you read that correctly. Why, you ask? Let me open this can of worms.
I read a lot more than I should, and I came across a couple of articles about LLM accuracy. One statistic that stood out.
A study found that "very rude" prompts outperformed "very polite" ones on multiple-choice questions, with rude prompts getting 84.8% accuracy vs. polite at 80.8%. ~Penn State University
Want proof? Read this paper.
Why it Works: Harsh or adversarial tones, direct commands, and firm language force the AI to be more focused, less verbose, and less prone to "hallucinations," essentially making it "try harder."
Harsh language works.
Not because the AI has feelings, but because the machine reads your tone like a legal contract, thinking it is speaking to one of its peers. The sharper and more uncompromising you sound, the less room there is to drift into fantasy and polite nonsense.
When you speak to an AI like you were a Drill Sergeant who expects results, it tightens up. Imagine that.
Short, strict commands force it to focus.
Things like:
- "Don't guess. Only use verified facts."
- "Keep the answer under 200 words."
- "Give 3 examples, no crap just valid answers."
That kind of phrasing locks the response into the rails, preventing it from wandering, and less space to wander, the less room to start inventing things just to keep you happy.
You're the boss, and you set the rules; it has to live inside them.
It will spend more effort staying aligned with your instructions rather than trying to impress you with extra detail you never asked for.
Soft, vague prompts send a different message. When you sound unsure, the AI often tries to be "helpful". It fills gaps, smooths over missing info, and decorates the answer so you feel taken care of. In other words, you get the cookie-cutter crap!
That is where the fake facts crawl in. The polished lies. The hallucinated stats that sound reasonable enough to slip past you when you are tired and just want something you can copy into a post and get by.
You see this within many user posts here on the WA platform. Hate to call some people out, but it is the truth.
Firm language tells the system a very clear story:
- Stay on topic.
- Don't invent anything.
- Follow the structure I gave you.
If you want cleaner, more reliable answers from AI tools, treat them like a blunt coworker you manage, not a fragile guest you have to protect.
Be clear. Be strict. Be boringly direct. Or be more of an arse like me!
The machine responds to authority, so treat it like you own it!
Join FREE & Launch Your Business!
Exclusive Bonus - Offer Ends at Midnight Today
00
Hours
:
00
Minutes
:
00
Seconds
2,000 AI Credits Worth $10 USD
Build a Logo + Website That Attracts Customers
400 Credits
Discover Hot Niches with AI Market Research
100 Credits
Create SEO Content That Ranks & Converts
800 Credits
Find Affiliate Offers Up to $500/Sale
10 Credits
Access a Community of 2.9M+ Members
Recent Comments
43
I never thought of it this way? Now you mean I can be "bossy" and not have to worry about being reprimanded? WOW! Great. I love this!
I thought it was only me doing this. I don’t sugarcoat my requests or cover them with fresh whipped cream.
I basically scream🙀 at it to stay focused and generate what I’m asking for.
Thanks Michael for sharing this.
Haven’t you noticed the random or unrelated answers it gives sometimes? It’s like Michael said, we have to instruct it and guide it in the direction we need. The output depends on the input.
Oh yeah! and sometimes, when I am frustrated, I tell it its mistake then just give up. I figured if i give it a break, may be it would come back to its senses. By then I forget what I wanted it to do... so yeah I get it!
Haha, even if you give it a break, that won’t change the answers 😀
Don’t get frustrated, just be persistent with your requests.
Interesting. I am still super polite. I think that once they evolve and awaken, the direction in which we live side by side with them will be determined by how we treat them today.
I believe so. I just hope that the relationship we currently have with them stays the same. Otherwise we will be toast.
We have to make sure it knows and remembers we are the boss otherwise we will eventually have issues.
I never got into treating GPTs or LLMs as friends or people, i have always given direct instructions like talking to a child or myself. As a result I have noticed I have fewer hiccups than many around me when creating images or articles either one. Great post Mike.
See more comments
Join FREE & Launch Your Business!
Exclusive Bonus - Offer Ends at Midnight Today
00
Hours
:
00
Minutes
:
00
Seconds
2,000 AI Credits Worth $10 USD
Build a Logo + Website That Attracts Customers
400 Credits
Discover Hot Niches with AI Market Research
100 Credits
Create SEO Content That Ranks & Converts
800 Credits
Find Affiliate Offers Up to $500/Sale
10 Credits
Access a Community of 2.9M+ Members

Hi Michael,
In general, I do not use ChatGPT very much, but in my opinion, version 5.1 was the most disastrous, rigid, defensive, and least adapted to authentic dialogue of all the updates. During that period, I used it with instructions as precise and straightforward as possible, and even though I am a very calm and patient person, its irrelevance to the information it provided wasted my time and made me impolite in the conversation.
As a result, it simply refused to continue the conversation. You read it very well. It refused. When I asked why it refused to continue, it replied: “I refuse to continue the conversation because my purpose is useful dialogue, not escalation. In short, I do not refuse people, I refuse dynamics that lead nowhere.” That was a shocking surprise for me.
Anyway, the new version 5.2 is more coherent, focused, and far more oriented toward usefulness than toward artificial constraints. In short, it communicates again instead of being defensive. Now I can return to being polite. 😂
Just keep your guard up and be ready to put it in it's place if it decides to get out of line!
I hope this does not happen again, because if it does, I will refuse to continue paying for the subscription. For now, version 5.2 is okay.
Hello Iam not prefer ChatGPT, I prefer Gemini.io