I've been doing some work in Jaaxy trying to find keywords.
What do you think about this scenario? What would you do?
- Suppose "Loads OF Leads C
Google likes content that makes sense and is written in a natural style so I think leaving out the "of" would be seen as an attempt to game the system. That's my opinion but let's wait and see what other members say.
Your keywords must ALWAYS make sense, and be capable of being written naturally, take a look at this example. If you search for > money make how < you'll find that Google returns search results with the order reversed to make sense, ie. you'll see the words in bold in the sequence > how make money < There's no point in targeting keywords that Google and other search engines won't return and therefore won't rank. :) Rich.
Thanks Rich.
So "quick ways to make money" has 366 QSR.
"quick ways make money" has 96 QSR.
You're saying you wouldn't necessarily benefit from leaving out the "TO"?
Thanks again!
See more comments
Keyword Phrase Question - Your Two Cents?
I've been doing some work in Jaaxy trying to find keywords.
What do you think about this scenario? What would you do?
- Suppose "Loads OF Leads C
Google likes content that makes sense and is written in a natural style so I think leaving out the "of" would be seen as an attempt to game the system. That's my opinion but let's wait and see what other members say.
Your keywords must ALWAYS make sense, and be capable of being written naturally, take a look at this example. If you search for > money make how < you'll find that Google returns search results with the order reversed to make sense, ie. you'll see the words in bold in the sequence > how make money < There's no point in targeting keywords that Google and other search engines won't return and therefore won't rank. :) Rich.
Thanks Rich.
So "quick ways to make money" has 366 QSR.
"quick ways make money" has 96 QSR.
You're saying you wouldn't necessarily benefit from leaving out the "TO"?
Thanks again!
See more comments
Quick ways make money...no way you can use that and be grammatically correct. Sorry