Conclusion:



These scores may rate highly on your “So What” meter. It may seem that we have just made writing content a little more complicated. Will I use these scoring methods in the future? Possibly. But my SEO by Yoast plug-in has the Flesch Readability Ease built in and now that I understand its value, I will pay a lot more attention to it.

Readability of your website is crucial. If our niche is a technical website, then knowing there are ways to analyse writing style, will make it appeal to the geeks who visit your site often. But a general interest niche, one that is aiming for a more widespread demographic, will need to be readable to people of all ages and educational backgrounds. Having a tool to enhance readability may just be the ticket to visitors coming back more often.

I hope you enjoyed this training. Leave your valued opinions below...



P.S. The Flesch Readability Ease Score for this training, excluding the Wikipedia quotes, was 71.3. The SMOG score was 7.2 and the Automated Readability Index 6.6. I love those numbers.


All images courtesy of communicatehealth.com

Like This 26
Previous Page
Next Page


Join the Discussion
Write something…
Recent messages
barsum52 Premium
Thanks Funkydunc.Thats a great tool.I just did a test and my overall readability score was 77.9.Is that good or bad? Thank you again.
Barry
Reply
Funkydunc208 Premium
@barsum52
Barry, that is very readable content that doesn't require a uni degree to understand. Naturally, we don't want it to be too simple, but that is a very good score.
Reply
Loes Premium
I am always in the green numbers with the flesch readability test, because my English is of kindergarten level.

But I have a Dutch website, and the readability test isn't working there. It seems that the Flesch readability engine doesn't speak any foreign language ;)
Reply
Funkydunc208 Premium
@Loes
Oh dear, what a shame about there not being a Dutch test. Maybe, we can design one and call it the Loes test. If Loes finds it an easy read, then an appropriate points score can be awarded. :))
Reply
Loes Premium
@Funkydunc208
:) perhaps a whole in the market:)
Reply
lavera Premium
Thank you so much for this training, finally i know what all those numbers mean and can read about them in one place. Bookmarked :)
Reply
Funkydunc208 Premium
@lavera
Glad you enjoyed it so much. We all have the capacity to write killer content in our own unique style. Developing that style and maintaining confidence in it is the key. A few tools to assist us along the way can help.
Reply
stevechic Premium
Thankyou very much so helpful will definitely be using this and checking my readability scores. Just ten to write what comes into my head and publish at present.
Reply
Funkydunc208 Premium
@stevechic
Yes, but Steve, that may be killer content since it is how you speak naturally and so we readers will connect with what you say.
Reply
stevechic Premium
@Funkydunc208
If this is true then I will continue to just write as I feel thanks
Reply
Funkydunc208 Premium
@stevechic
Be true to your own personality and develop the writing skills that make you shine, that allows you to express who you are. That way, those of us who have just met you, will get to know you through your fascinating and killer content.
Reply
kennick2015 Premium
Funkydunc, that is an outstanding set of training lessons you have provided to the members. The ability for everyone to be able to write content that is easy to read and be understood is paramount to engaging your audience. It does not, however, come easily to many people and your lessons will go a long way to give confidence to those, and with the tools you provided at least allow them to better check their content. for readability. I do find one of the most annoying traits is the lack of proof reading before publishing a post or a page. The need to get it online hastily without the proper checks can be seriously detrimental to the writers' credibility and harmful in being able to maintain their audience in the long term. Again, a great series of lessons!
Reply
Funkydunc208 Premium
@kennick2015
Thanks, buddy, for your positive response. I am glad you enjoyed and benefited from it. I must have proof read the training five times and tweaked it each time. Some great points you raise in your comments.
Reply
Top