Wealthy Affiliate, AI, and the Value of Real-World Experience.

byRobbyofstone

554 followers

6 months ago

Wealthy Affiliate, AI, and the Value of Real-World Experience.
From a Mason and Builder's Perspective.

This is just my take -- drawn from decades in the real world of construction and business, and now after a year of intense use of AI tools and online platforms. My experience may not speak for everyone, but I believe it represents many voices that aren’t being heard clearly enough. Even the voices of the AI models😊

And Yes I use AI to help me write this post but the research and much of the content is mine as I use AI to correct my English and gramma.

I’ve spent my life building things with my hands, leading teams, and running businesses. I’ve seen success and lost it all, only to rebuild again. Over the last year, Wealthy Affiliate (WA) has helped me make a different kind of comeback -- one rooted in affiliate marketing, SEO, and the modern tools of the digital world. It’s also been an important part of my personal recovery, helping me rediscover purpose after a serious breakdown years ago.

WA continues to promote quality, experience-based content. Their training is structured and accessible, and many members genuinely thrive by writing about topics like food, health, fitness, lifestyle, and even areas like haircare and beauty. In those types of content, I’ve seen AI -- including WA’s AI writer -- do a decent job, especially when guided by human insight.

But my own path, and the problems I’ve discovered, lie elsewhere.

Every day, I test and challenge the responses I get from the biggest AI models -- including Google’s own. I’ve asked them tough questions, mostly in the field I know: construction, repairs, materials, trades. And time and time again, I’ve received polished, confident answers that sound right -- but are factually wrong. Not just wrong in small ways, but wrong in ways that could cost people money, cause delays, or even risk someone’s safety if followed blindly. And when I challenge the AI, many times it comes back and says, “thank you for pointing that out and you are correct” that’s after I believe it did a search using the facts I gave it, so some of the correct information is out there somewhere.

The issue is this: unless you’ve done the job, lived the process, handled the tools -- you might not even realise it’s incorrect.

That’s what concerns me the most. I see other WA members with trade backgrounds -- many retired or semi-retired, hoping for some passive income -- and I wonder how many have been burned by the same issues. Ironically, some were likely hurt by Google’s recent algorithm changes, which penalised generic AI content. And yet, the people most qualified to write helpful content -- the ones with years of field experience -- were never part of that conversation.

The disconnect between the tech developers and the people who’ve done the work on the ground is deep. In trying to clean up bad content, they erased some of the best. Google’s shift might have been necessary -- but it could have been handled far better.

That’s the message I want to get across.

WA’s AI writer is a useful tool. But like all AI content creators today, it needs oversight -- especially in technical, practical industries. I’ve fallen into the trap myself, trusting what the AI gave me. Fortunately, fellow WA members helped me see the flaws and encouraged me to improve how I use these tools. I’m learning. I’m adjusting. But the key is: we mustn’t assume these tools are right -- especially when it really matters.

This post isn’t written to criticise WA. Quite the opposite. WA is one of the best-positioned platforms to raise the standard. They already value human experience. They already have a diverse and skilled community. In fact, they should have been part of Google’s discussions before those big updates rolled out.

Here’s my suggestion -- and my offer:
Let’s bring real-world experience back into the loop. Let’s connect builders, engineers, electricians, mechanics, roofers -- all of us who know the difference between a good answer and a dangerous one -- with the people creating these tools. Let’s stop assuming tech and the techies behind the tech can replace the various industries common sense and knowledge gained

Because in practical industries, publishing unchecked AI content isn’t just a risk to credibility -- it’s a real risk to real people.

It's got to be fixed, so let’s fix it together. Because AI is here to stay of that I am sure.

Rob