Of course i'm speculating here but my impression is that Google, as part of their quest to provide users with an increasingly improving experience on their platform, is trying to determine what has been generated by a living, breathing human being and what has been generated by AI. The irony in all of this, of course, is that they are trying to elevate content that is generated by a human being apart from what has been generated by AI...and using AI in making, or at least assisting in, that determination....

Thanks Diane for writing this post. I think we need to be told the truth and you are right. I can also tell when I read someone’s website whether it's the AI speaking or the human 🙂🙂.

I use AI a lot but I try my very best to just take the information and reword it as naturally as possible. I also don't like the repetitiveness. Way too obvious!

Thank you, Diane (Fluffy!)
I am saying goodbye to INVASIVE AI, as I love it for the ideas it gives me, but I am not too fond of it for the following:

Farewell, dear companions, as we part ways on this path of shared enlightenment. May our spirits remain illuminated by the flames of comprehension, and may our intellects continue to be ignited by the unyielding pursuit of knowledge. The intricate web of wisdom we have collectively crafted serves as a testament to the infinite possibilities nestled within the amalgamation of contemplation, engagement, and ambition. May your odyssey across the lush meadows of wisdom forever be adorned with the blossoms of understanding, and may the constellations of sagacity serve as beacons, guiding you through the vast realms of the enigmatic and unexplored.

If I spoke like this, what planet would I be from?
Corinne

As you have suggested, it seems that the term 'artificial' intelligence is the shoe that fits...I am guessing that I, personally, intuitively sort of initially recoiled at the idea of AI and you have put to words what, perhaps, my intuition told me. I suspect the same sort of 'close but no cigar' characterization would, for the same reasons, apply to the so-called 'smart' cities the illuminati have planned for us all. As you have cleverly illustrated, there is no substitute whatsoever, nor can there be, for the human spirit, ingenuity, creativity and so much else that makes us who we are. I know nothing about AI and I suppose I'll be dragged, kicking and screaming, into educating myself on the mechanics of it's employment at some point. I suppose some tasks could be assigned to AI to make the completion of those tasks more efficient as you have pointed out. But, apart from use-cases that would be ultimately be circumscribed in scope, any suggestion that AI could be substituted for anything that makes us human amounts to arrogance, presumption and delusion...

Hello Diane,
I am so glad you wrote this post. I have also noticed the new and flowery language that is being adopted.

I hate it and it really is drivel.
Some posts scream AI and I lose interest.

I have asked myself, if I can see the AI driven posts with my untrained eye, wouldn't Google see it long before I do?
I sure hope so and I hope this blatant plagerism is discouraged.

As writers, don't we all want to be known for original content? Of course we do - this is our opportunity to use our voice.

I am no longer worried about AI. In my head, it is in perspective. This is a good thing because in the beginning I thought AI would take over and I would never be able to keep up.

It's useful though. AI presents me with lots of good ideas and some better and more appropriate words. But I only need to use my own style.

Thanks for another great post Diane.
Well said and to the point.

Regards, Corinne