Do you trust your bank?
DO I TRUST MY BANK?
I will supply a salt shaker along with that question and my answer. Though I studied business in college and pretend-study it now via my favorite investment websites, I am by no means an expert in finance and banking. However, I'm sure we all have a sincere interest in our money.
I can't speak for countries other than the United States, but I would enjoy hearing from you on the subject.
It takes governments so long to get anything done, at times, one forgets what they are actually working on, although ours has been incredibly fast at ruining our economy. And from what I read, it seems the global economy isn't faring much better. Since the stock market began its decline last August, with the crypto market copycatting, this kind of bad news, every day, begins to wear on one-- and one begins to wonder if there are any institutions one can trust.
There's that word: TRUST

(A side-note: I generated the picture in an AI program in Shutterstock, using keywords: modern bank, blockchain, a few others, and I think, watercolor. How fun was that!?)
I am working toward the larger meaning of trust in this article, but first I need us to understand the definitions of DeFi, Trust, and Trustless as it relates to our current, though quickly evolving, banking system.
Getting used to a whole new category of vocabulary since the entrance of blockchain, Bitcoin, and crypto (short for cryptocurrency), for some of us is an arduous task, perhaps, not even worth pursuing.
The problem is, unless our kids are handling these kinds of things for us, we need to pursue the task, and arduously. We need a basic grasp of the situation sooner than later because. . ..
We need a plan before our governments and our bankers give us one, which they want to, and which, in the U.S. they already have a plan for some sort of roll-out of digital currency in July, '23.
I apologize for how boring this is to read. How does one make banking theory not boring? Money is fun. Banking is not. That's why I prefer watercolor AI images to accounting.
Enough, Donna! Stop packing the word count with more boring words than is necessary.
From Webster: Trustless means not deserving of trust.
The concept of trustlessness is a core element of blockchain, crypto payments, and smart contracts. “Trustless” means that you don't have to trust a third party: a bank, a person, or any intermediary that could operate between you and your cryptocurrency transactions or holdings." (Gemini)
Recent Examples on the Web
Even the Eeyores at The Economist made a point to praise blockchain’s transparency and efficiency, and its capacity for trustless smart contracts and novel governance arrangements through token distribution.—Byjeff John Roberts, Fortune, 22 Nov. 2022
Replacing them will instead be stakers, who will assume their job maintaining the security of its trustless payment network.—Christian Hetzner, Fortune, 29 July 2022
This network will be immutable and trustless, verifying transactions without human intervention. Michel Kilzi, Forbes, 20 May 2022
So you see, in the matter of a blockchain, trustless is good, because the blockchain is a very, very large, the larger, the better, network, a system of humans who put up a very large collateral of fiat money, or in the case of Bitcoin, power, equipment and time so that is they cheat they don't get it back.
And because of that we trust the system. How many times have you heard Jay say: Just trust the system. LOL.
We're Almost Finished Here

DeFi equals Decentralized Finance: We had that discussion in my previous post. For a more in depth, however simplistic, explanation of decentralized versus centralized, see my previous post.
And as always, our good friend, Frank the Guitar Man, helped me out with a clear definition of blockchain and extra links in the comments section of that post. I encourage you to read what he says for clarification and new information.
More Happy Thoughts
I have also read when there is a recession in the local economy, but not globally at the same time, it will likely recover, but when there is a recession locally and globally at the same time, that is far more serious, and is very infrequent.
I read a long time ago that the government wants a cashless society and was looking into forming its own digital currency, which at the time, I didn't know what it was, what it was for, and why they wanted it.
Last year it seemed like the government and banks were in solid cahoots, at least sounded, with carefully curated rhetoric, like they had a clue. But this year, I wonder if any of them seriously know what they are doing.
Banks have been known to freeze accounts. It happened in Canada when the truckers went on strike. (I think this was in '22) They could not get money from their accounts and neither could the families and friends who tried to support them while they were off work. They turned to Bitcoin because it could not be controlled.
If you're a trucker, you have to keep moving. They gave up a lot to raise awareness for their cause. As an X trucker, I wanted so much to get in their convoy.
Whatever it might be, gold, silver, crypto, a plan B is a good plan-- maybe a plan C and D too.
Thank you for reading my article.
Join FREE & Launch Your Business!
Exclusive Bonus - Offer Ends at Midnight Today
00
Hours
:
00
Minutes
:
00
Seconds
2,000 AI Credits Worth $10 USD
Build a Logo + Website That Attracts Customers
400 Credits
Discover Hot Niches with AI Market Research
100 Credits
Create SEO Content That Ranks & Converts
800 Credits
Find Affiliate Offers Up to $500/Sale
10 Credits
Access a Community of 2.9M+ Members
Recent Comments
54
I don't completely trust any bank, but I will trust them a lot more than bitcoin or crypto. Ill trust gold and silver over those.
Fortunately I don't keep my eggs in one basket and don't plan on participating in any digital currency just so they can monitor and control me.
Appreciate the post!
Isaiah 😊
Those are good choices you're making, Isaiah. Just stay aware and do what you can do. Thank you for reading this and commenting. I appreciate it.
Those who control the creation and destruction of the currency control those using it.
Have you noticed in the last 50 years how restrictive things have become over spending ones own earned currency?
How you have to ask permission in some cases now, that banks have the right to deny you access to your own money?
I find it interesting that most countries are using a private organization to create the currency from nothing.
I have to shake my head at those in the crypto world who believe Bitcoin (or any other crypto) is the door to freedom. Governments been seizing crypto in huge amounts (just a few years ago the largest holder of Bitcoin was the U.S. government, and not because they were buying any dips, hah hah).
The second part of that equation is the sole value of these coins are based on the printed currencies of the very banks they purport to be replacing.
I could go on, but I see where we were, and where we are and where we are headed.
The young today have no idea of the freedoms that have eroded over the last half century. The privacy we used to have, etc.
Until a time folks realize that currency is an idea, a means to acquire and not the things being acquired these chains will only get tighter. Currency (regardless of form) was a great concept as it facilitated a medium of exchange between different forms of acquisition. It has morphed into chains instead.
Great post, one I'm surprised to read here.
I would recommend if folks are somewhat interested in the history of banking to read a book by William Greider called Secrets of the Temple: How the Federal Reserve Runs the Country. Its an in-depth examination into the history of banking and the Federal Reserve. It's not a short read, but a captivating one.
Regards,
Jason
Thank you, Jason, for an informative comment. I agree with most of what you said. Could you tell me where you heard/read about the U.S. government owning large amounts of Bitcoin? I thought most of them (politicians) didn't even know or care what it is.
I would like to read your book suggestion. I'm headed to Amazon. I suppose somebody paid off Nixon to lift the gold standard. If you're into the rise of Google, and other tech companies of that era, let me return the favor and suggest "Life After Google" by George Gilder. There were times I couldn't put it down and am now on the second read.
Thanks again. Talk soon,
On the government holding of Bitcoin, put this into Google,
us government largest holder of Bitcoin
Evidently they once again are the largest holder of it.
When I read it the first time it was largely due to confiscations the FBI had done, but I know they sold a large amount of that at auction. Evidently it is the well that keeps giving for them.
I'm not sure what Nixon was thinking. I've begun thinking in recent years that the possibility of reaching levels of power that high without having sold out are pretty slim, which is why nothing ever changes for the better overall.
Supposedly (you can Google this as well) all but one U.S. president are somehow related, which is a bizarre coincidence despite the distance of the relation in my opinion. Even Bush and Obama are said to be 10th cousins.
This strange dynamic also seems to happen with other positions of power. For example, Cheney is more closely related to Obama than Bush is (8th cousins).
Regardless of the implications, I lean towards George Carlins bit on there is a big club and we aren't part of it, hah hah.
I'll bookmark that book title for when I get some time to read, thanks so much for the recommendation. :)
Regards,
Jason
Thank you, Jason, for more interesting information. And I'm glad I am not a member of their club.
Hi Donna,
You asked a great question. Do you trust your bank? I have a one-word response.
NO!
I recently wrote a post here giving a good reason why I don't.
Cheers.
Edwin
Thanks for reading, Edwin. I'll have to look up your post. And I agree, NO. Not much you can trust-- and as I said it's really tiring having to watch my back all the time. Talk soon.
You have covered a lot of territory in this post. The unfortunate fact is that, whether fiat or crypto, money is an artificial concept if there is nothing tangible connected to it. We all kind of buy into it, but it doesn't take much to make it all tumble. My family bought a cottage 70 years ago for $1200. We listed it for 1.3 million this year and think we might get as much as 1.6. The cottage is 70 years old. The land is the same. What makes it 1000 time more valuable? Really nothing other than the price of everything else. I am glad the system is the way it is. I just hope it holds out until I can turn my share into something real.
Jim
Hi Jim. Is that how you prefer to be called? Or is it Reverend or Dr.?Your family made a smart decision back then. I hope it works out for you too. I'm sure it will. Real estate always seems to bounce back. And it's tangible. It's not going away. Thanks for reading and for your interesting to read reply. Talk again soon.
Thank you for reading my post, Mike. I appreciate your time. And thank you for the compliment.
I get where you’re coming from, Donna…and after seeing what happened to those involved with last winter’s Free.dom Convoy, we saw first hand what could happen when one doesn’t follow the narrative. Where it’s all going is the real concern.
Susan
Thanks, Susan, for reading and for your answer. I should have figured this out, but are you from the U.S. or Canada? It seems like the Freedom Convoy started in Barstow, California. I wanted to join that one too. There is no easy answer here. I think Dr. Jim, above, is right. Real estate will not disappear into thin air. I wish I had some. Gold and silver seem good to me right now too. But some call Bitcoin the "new gold". So who knows? We'll be fine. Writing won't go away. We can write.
Yes, Banking rules are strict. I understand your perspective in this post. I will leave it at that. I am with Jeff. I have no problems with my bank. Im not into crypto or bitcoin or any of those. I will respect other people who wish to be involved with the topic you discussed in this post.
Hi, Brenda. Thank you for reading my little sort of rant. I am happy you understand my point. That's really all I can ask. And I'm still not selling Bitcoin, but I suppose I could get there. LOL. See you in school.
Hi again, Brenda. I do remember that time-- and the time that came before. I remember gas lines, and high interest, which worked to my advantage because I was selling an ITT annuity, and no Christmas tree lights for a few years. Wow.
From Google: "Home mortgage rates averaged about 8.85% at the onset of the Carter administration in 1977. However, by the end of Carter's presidency in 1981, home mortgage rates averaged a whopping 16.64%. Home mortgage rates have not been this high since the Carter administration.
I have more coming on the "alien invasion" soon. Thanks for a little trip into the past. Talk again soon.
See more comments
Join FREE & Launch Your Business!
Exclusive Bonus - Offer Ends at Midnight Today
00
Hours
:
00
Minutes
:
00
Seconds
2,000 AI Credits Worth $10 USD
Build a Logo + Website That Attracts Customers
400 Credits
Discover Hot Niches with AI Market Research
100 Credits
Create SEO Content That Ranks & Converts
800 Credits
Find Affiliate Offers Up to $500/Sale
10 Credits
Access a Community of 2.9M+ Members

If you're looking for a trustworthy resource for up-to-date information on betting strategies, check out https://meteolaram.org/sub-peste-0-5-goluri-strategii-de-pariuri/ You'll find detailed analyses, useful tips, and strategies to help you make informed choices. Don’t miss the chance to improve your skills and increase your chances of success in betting