Review The Reviewers

byavmacariola

186 followers

12 years ago

Having been online for some time now, I observe some common practices which for me needs a little correction. As a buyer of internet tools/resources or when shopping for money making programs online it is but prudent to check first the product from people who supposedly knows the product better than you.

One way to check that is to look for Product Reviews, there are good Product Reviews but oftentimes when you google search a certain product most product reviews are nothing but sales page just hyping out the product. I don't have problem of pointing out the benefits of a product. But spreading some figures that are blatant lies or concealing some vital info to deceive other people are just too disgusting to be taken lightly.

One common practice that I also don't agree with some scrupulous product reviewers are bashing out other programs or companies but the ulterior motive is to promote their own programs in the latter part of the review. I also don't have a problem with negative reviews, actually they are helping others to stay away with false products.

Problem is if a product reviewer are not stating facts and that they are making their conclusions based on hearsay alone. I even encountered people on the internet making product reviews without joining or testing the program themselves. It should have been called Product Speculations and not Product Reviews. Reviews are meant to be feedback from people who has extensive knowledge on the subject and not merely second guessing. People are looking for guidance and reviewers are not supposed to add confusion by stating unverified facts.

I even read a page 1 on Google making a review on Profit Clicking calling it a Ponzi scheme and is on a melt down. Problem is, the author seems to be not a member of the said program and is concluding based on the Facebook communication of some members complaining during server migration.

As a member of this program for about 6 months already, I feel that I know better than the author of said review. That although I encountered some disappointments especially on how they handled matters for us during migration period. I truly know that you can still make money on Profit Clicking as it has done for so many years already and that after this period it is geared to deliver the same performance since its inception back in 2004. I certainly know that this is not a Ponzi scheme, it has features that is certainly not Ponzi scheme. Ponzi schemes do not last that long, usually they fold on one or two years of existence for plain and simple reason that Ponzi schemes are not sustainable. If they are paying too much naturally they would not last that long, they will eventually reach a 'kill point' because the system is not right or not built to last. Profit Clicking has a Restart now called Profit Shift feature that makes it to be indefinitely sustainable but I don't mean to discuss it extensively here. If you need more info on Profit Clicking please visit here What Is Profit Clicking?

Anyway, my point here is for buyers to check not only the product or program they are interested in. But also the information they are getting on reviews, please verify the authors of the review. It only takes little common sense to see that reviewers have other motives other than provide information or guidance. I do not see anything wrong with reviewers getting some sales due to their effort but spreading lies or misinformation is another story.