Kyle's out of whack content checker
A number of people have complained about posting content on their blogs that they know is uniquely formulated. .
I posted earlier a great concept on artificial intelligence and the advanced computations on interpreting machine language. Then I almost couldn't publish great information because of a content checker that's in the stone age!
Finally I had to derive and experiment by taking a good enriched paragraph of my own devising out of the mix. I figured that the haywire detector may have used length of post against authorship. It worked! But it shouldn't have to be this way. Sometimes you have to accelerate progress yourself here due to inordinate and indirect lag time in obtaining redress for bumbled tools suppressing authorship!
Moving forward with constructive criticism against ineffective tools in this great community
Recent Comments
43
You can write all the copy you want on your own website. I can understand that Kyle doesn't want it on his.
You content may be original, but the bot is finding exact phrases already published online.
Is the problem with WA or the Google algorithm that doesn't account for quoted copy with citation?
Intelligence and mind are not a monopoly of the persons who have thought of something before us.
Different people of different times can have the same perception of a thing.
Machines are giving as a problem about that. I hope time will come that machines will learn to have a problem who are an authority in such an idea rather than people being controlled by machines.
I was not aware of a content checker however I know there are many other improvements on the way so hopefully that will be one of them
Basically a content checker identifies any duplicate content that has already been posted on the web, Sorta checking for Plagiarism which is a Big no no with Google. Hope this helped you out a little.
Garland
Yes, real problems with serious blogs when you want to give a reference to some source, or literary bogs with the excerpts from the poems, etc.Even if it is correctly organised- with the citation marks and reference to the source.That's a hassle.:(
Yes, I have experienced this once or twice as well...If you quote something from a post or an article, even with a citation and quotation marks, it gets flagged...
In each case, I had to remove most of the quote to get the post to be accepted and published...Perhaps making an image of the quoted material is the answer, with attribution within the image...
Next time that is what I intend on doing...Then, to make sure that the post will make sense to the search engines, synopsize the quote so the flow of the post remains and makes sense...
Think that would work?
Cheers!
Dave : )
I reckon if you go round 'n round enough soon enough you'll be going in circles. All makes sense to me.
See more comments
Ah the greatness of constructive criticism ;) Great post I enjoyed waking up to that with a fresh cup of coffee.
Garland